Publicación:
Understanding differentiated instruction to promote oral interaction among blind learners in a mainstream class

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCaré Martínez, Ruth Estherspa
dc.coverage.spatialMontería, Córdobaspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-28T12:50:48Zspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-24T21:30:16Zspa
dc.date.available2019-12-28T12:50:48Zspa
dc.date.available2019-09-24T21:30:16Zspa
dc.date.issued2019-12-20spa
dc.description.abstractChildren have the right to be educated regardless their abilities or disabilities, social status, religion and so forth. Unfortunately, over the years, people such as blind children have been excluded from society depriving them of their right of education (McCarthy & Shevlin, 2017). In the context of this study, few opportunities are given to blind students to improve the speaking skill. Moreover, I had a puzzle about teaching English to blind learners studying English in regular classrooms. Then, I need to understand how Differentiated instruction works within a regular lesson to promote oral interaction to blind students. Accordingly, this study aimed to explore teacher´s understanding of differentiated instruction for developing blind learners’ oral interaction. This exploratory practice study was carried out observing my own practice implementing differentiated instruction for teaching 3 blind students within a regular classroom from a public school in Monteria. Findings from this study evidenced that to ensure a coherent planning for all I must provide instruction that caters for all students. Besides, I must locate the challenges I faced in this process turning them into learning opportunities.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado(a) en Lenguas Extranjeras con Énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.description.modalityTrabajo de Investigación/Extensión
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 8spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................ 11spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1. Conceptual Framework .............................................. 11spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1.1. Integration, segregation and inclusion ...................................... 11spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1.2. Differentiated instruction. ......................................... 12spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1.3. Blind learners ........................................................... 18spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1.4. Adaptations ........................................................ 20spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2. Literature Review ...................................................... 22spa
dc.description.tableofcontents3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................. .27spa
dc.description.tableofcontents3.1. Type of research ................................................................ 27spa
dc.description.tableofcontents3.2. Context and participants ....................................... 28spa
dc.description.tableofcontents3.3. Data collection Procedures ............................................... 29spa
dc.description.tableofcontents3.4. Data Analysis ................................................................ 30spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4. FINDINGS. ................................................................... 32spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4.1. Providing instruction that caters for all students .................. 32spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4.1.1. Modelling lessons for demonstrating tasks ............................ 39spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4.1.2. Use of Spanish……………………………………………………..42spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4.1.3. Pre-assessment………………………………………………………………………..44spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4.1.4. Planning for all ………………………………………………………………………46spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4.2. Identifying challenges and overcoming difficulties ...................... 48spa
dc.description.tableofcontents5. DISCUSSION ................................................................. 51spa
dc.description.tableofcontents6. CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................ 55spa
dc.description.tableofcontents7. REFERENCES ......................................................... 57spa
dc.description.tableofcontents8. APPENDIXES ........................................................................................................... 62spa
dc.description.tableofcontents8.1. Appendix 1 –Journal lesson 2…………………………………………………………...62spa
dc.description.tableofcontents8.2. Appendix 2 – Journal lesson 1 ................................................. 64spa
dc.description.tableofcontents8.3. Appendix 3 – Pictures cooperative work ............................................ 66spa
dc.description.tableofcontents8.4. Appendix 4 – second differentiated lesson ....................................... 67spa
dc.format.mimetypeApplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/2466spa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdoba
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Educación y Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con Énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, G., & Barreto, K. (2016). Using classroom peer group as a di strategy to promote social acceptance of vi students in a regular classroom. (Unpublished BA). Universidad de Córdoba. Montería, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesArroyo, K., & Zabaleta, D. (2015). Exploring differentiated instruction in terms of strategies to teach English to visually impair students. (Unpublished BA dissertation). Universidad de Córdoba.Montería, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlaz, D. (2006). Differentiated Instruction: A guide for foreign language teachers. New York, NY: Richard H. Adin.spa
dc.relation.referencesBohorquez, P., & Agudelo, C. (2015). Exploring differentiated instruction to teach English to visually impaired students. (Unpublished BA dissertation). Universidad de Córdoba. Montería, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa?scroll=topspa
dc.relation.referencesBurkett, J. A. (2013). Teacher perception on differentiated instruction and its influence on instructional practice (Doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Edmond, Oklahoma.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastellanos, C. (1996). The blind child in the regular elementary classroom. National federation of the blind, 15(3), Retrieved from:https://nfb.org/images/nfb/publications/fr/fr15/issue3/f150302.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesCharters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesDonato, R. Action Research: Exploring teaching practices. University of Pittsburgh.spa
dc.relation.referencesElliott, V. F. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850-2861.spa
dc.relation.referencesErnest, J. M., Heckaman, K. A., Thompson, S. E., Hull, K. M., & Carter, S. W. (2011). Increasing the teaching efficacy of a beginning special education teacher using differentiated instruction: A case study. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 191-201.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerrance, E. (2000). Action research. Providence: Brown University. Retrieved from https://www.brown.edu/academics/education-alliance/sites/brown.edu.academics.education- alliance/files/publications/act_research.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesGarcia, P., Nieto, J., & Arbeláez, C. (2016). English teachers´ attitudes toward inclusive education: A literature review. Avances en Educación y Humanidades, 1(1), 61-71.spa
dc.relation.referencesHammeken, P. (2000). Inclusion 450 strategies for success. Minnetonka, Minesota: Peytral Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesHehir, T., Freeman, B., Lamoreau, R., Borquaye, Y., & Burke, S. (2016). A summary of the evidences on inclusive education. Sao Paulo: Abt Associates. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312084483_A_Summary_of_the_Research_Evidence on_Inclusive_Educationspa
dc.relation.referencesKawulich, B. B. (2005, May). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/rt/printerFriendly/466/996spa
dc.relation.referencesKleege, G., & Wallin, S. (2015). Audio Description as a pedagogical tool. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesLunsford, K. J. (2017). Challenges to Implementing Differentiated Instruction in Middle School Classrooms with Mixed Skill Levels (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minnesota, Minneapolis.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartin, J. (2019). Assistive technology for kids with learning and attention issues: what you need to know. Retrieved February 19, 2019 from [https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/assistive-technology/assistive-technologies-basics/assistive-technology-what-it-is-and-how-it-works]spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy, P. & Shevlin, M. (2017). Opportunities and challenges in secondary education for blind/vision-impaired people in the Republic of Ireland. Disability & Society, 327,1007-1026. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1337564spa
dc.relation.references60 Moira, M. & Brid, D. (2007). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J,3. Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe- j/article/viewFile/335/553spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D., & Bailey, K. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research. A comprehensive guide. Canada: Heinle, Cengage learning.spa
dc.relation.referencesOliver, F. (2016). Teachers' perspectives on differentiated instruction in the foreign language classroom (Doctoral dissertation). University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.spa
dc.relation.referencesRachmawati, M., & Nu’man, T. (2016). Differentiated instructions for special needs in inclusive schools: A preliminary study. Future Academy Cognitive Trading, 217,585-593. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.053spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, J. C. (2011). Differentiated instruction: Exploring implementation at the middle level (Doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020spa
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, C. A. (2001). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.spa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all. UNESCOspa
dc.relation.referencesWaterfield, J. and West, B. (2008) Meeting the specific requirements of Blind and Partially Sighted Students studying in Higher Education in the UK. Plymouth: University of Plymouth.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhipple, K. A. (2012). Differentiated instruction: A survey study of teacher understanding and implementation in a southeast Massachusetts school district (Doctoral dissertation). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilkinson, B. (2012). Suggested teaching strategies with blind learners and partially sighted students. University of Leicester: Cambridge.spa
dc.relation.referencesYanoff, J. (2007). The classroom teacher´s inclusion. Practical methods for integrating students with special needs. Chicago: Arthur Coyle Press.spa
dc.rightsCopyright Universidad de Córdoba, 2020spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.keywordsDifferentiated instructionspa
dc.subject.keywordsBlind learnersspa
dc.subject.keywordsInclusionspa
dc.subject.keywordsTeaching practicespa
dc.subject.proposalInstrucción diferenciadaspa
dc.subject.proposalEstudiantes ciegosspa
dc.subject.proposalInclusiónspa
dc.subject.proposalPráctica docentespa
dc.titleUnderstanding differentiated instruction to promote oral interaction among blind learners in a mainstream classspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverInfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TPspa
dc.type.versionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
caremartinezruth.pdf
Tamaño:
1.63 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
formato de autorizacion.pdf
Tamaño:
1.1 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.48 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
E.D.A. Trabajos de Investigación y/o Extensión