Publicación:
Using game-based conversational activities to enhance oral interaction in a primary school in Montería

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorGonzález Lara, Delia Rosaspa
dc.contributor.authorArchila Ruidíaz, Andrés Camilospa
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T02:16:03Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06T02:16:03Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-02
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative action research aimed, firstly, to examine whether or not the implementing game-based conversational activities enhance oral interaction in a group of 5th grade students from a public school of Montería taking into consideration the advantages of games to develop speaking skills. Secondly, to know students’ opinions regarding the deployment of games based conversational activities in the class. The data collection was done through the implementation of production tasks (game based conversational activities), active observation, audio-visual recordings, focus groups and semi-structured interviews; besides, it was carried out thematic analysis to generate the categories of this study. The results showed a slight increment on students’ oral interaction after the implementation of games, also, it was observed a positive impact on students’ engagement, reduction of negative feelings related to expressing ideas orally during the English class, while students also seemed to enhance their confidence to speak in English, as well as collaborate more with peers. Future studies of games-base activities should consider the adaptation of games frameworks taking into account students’ context and communicative approaches, strategies to minimize disruptive behavior, the relevance of non-verbal communication as complement during oral interaction as well as the impact of games to reduce the use of the L1 during L2 learning.eng
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado(a) en Educación Básica con Énfasis en Humanidades-Inglésspa
dc.description.modalityTrabajos de Investigación y/o Extensiónspa
dc.description.resumenEsta investigación acción cualitativa apuntaba, en primer lugar, a examinar si la implementación de actividades basadas en juegos comunicativos mejora o no la interacción oral en un grupo estudiantes de grado 5° pertenecientes a una escuela pública de Montería, teniendo en cuenta las ventajas de los juegos para desarrollar habilidades discursivas. En segundo lugar, se buscó conocer las opiniones de los estudiantes en relación al empleo de actividades conversacionales basadas en juegos en sus clases. La recolección de datos para resolver las anteriores preguntas, se realizó a través de la implementación de tareas basadas en juegos comunicativos, observación activa, grabación de material audiovisual, grupos focales y entrevistas semiestructuradas; además, se llevó a cabo un análisis temático para generar las categorías del estudio. Los resultados mostraron un ligero incremento en la interacción oral de los estudiantes después de la aplicación de los juegos. También se observó un impacto positivo en la concentración de los estudiantes, reducción de sentimientos negativos relacionados a expresar sus ideas de forma oral durante la clase de inglés, mientras también parecieron mejorar su confianza al hablar en inglés, así como también la colaboración con sus compañeros. Futuros estudios de actividades basadas en juegos deberían considerar la adaptación de las estructuras de los juegos teniendo en cuenta el contexto de los estudiantes y acercamientos más comunicativos, estrategias para minimizar comportamientos disruptivos, la relevancia de la comunicación no verbal como complemento durante las interacciones orales, así como también el impacto de los juegos en la reducción de la primera lengua durante el aprendizaje de una segunda lengua.spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….IVeng
dc.description.tableofcontentsACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………...VIeng
dc.description.tableofcontentsLIST OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………...VIIeng
dc.description.tableofcontentsINTRODUTION……………………………………………………………………………1eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK……………………………………….5eng
dc.description.tableofcontents1.1 Oral Interaction………………………………………………………………………...5eng
dc.description.tableofcontents1.2 Game-based Conversational Activities……………………………………………….8eng
dc.description.tableofcontents1.3 Advantages of Game-based Conversational Activities……………………………..10eng
dc.description.tableofcontents1.4 Examples Of game-based Conversational Activities……………………………….12eng
dc.description.tableofcontents1.5 Possible adaptations to the games……………………………………………………15eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………..19eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………….24eng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.1 Type of Study………………………………………………………………………….24eng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.2 Context and Participants……………………………………………………………..26eng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.3 Ethical Considerations of Working with Children…………………………………27eng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.4 Data Collection Procedures…………………………………………………………..28eng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.5 Data Analysis………………………………………………………………………….30eng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.6 Implementation……………………………………………………………………….33eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 4: FINDINGS………………………………………………………………..36eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………….58eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………….62eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsREFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………63eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsAPPENDIX………………………………………………………………………………..68eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/7031
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Educación y Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeMontería, Córdoba, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Educación Básica con Énfasis en Humanidades-Inglésspa
dc.rightsCopyright Universidad de Córdoba, 2023spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.keywordsOral interactioneng
dc.subject.keywordsGame-based conversational activitieseng
dc.subject.keywordsOral comunicationeng
dc.subject.keywordsGameseng
dc.subject.proposalInteracción oralspa
dc.subject.proposalJuegos basados en actividades conversacionalesspa
dc.subject.proposalComunicación oralspa
dc.subject.proposalJuegosspa
dc.titleUsing game-based conversational activities to enhance oral interaction in a primary school in Monteríaeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TPeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionspa
dcterms.referencesAli, A. (2018). Understanding the complex process of oral communication. International Journal, 6(1), 123-128spa
dcterms.referencesAmri, U. (2016). Increasing Students’ Vocabulary Mastery by Using Eye-Spy Game at the Second Grade of SMP Babussalam Selayar (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar).spa
dcterms.referencesAnnink, A. (2017). Using the Research Journal during Qualitative Data Collection in a Cross-Cultural Context. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1), 20150063. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0063spa
dcterms.referencesAssembly, U. G. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. UN General Assembly, 302(2), 14-25.spa
dcterms.referencesBarbara, J. (2017). Measuring User Experience in Multiplayer Board Games. Games and Culture, 12(7–8), 623–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015593419spa
dcterms.referencesBayeck, R. Y. (2020). Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research. Simulation & Gaming, 51(4), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119901286spa
dcterms.referencesBlack N. (1994). Why we need qualitative research. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 48(5), 425–426. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.48.5.425-aspa
dcterms.referencesBrumfit, Christopher (et. all). 1995. Teaching English to Children. New York: Longman.spa
dcterms.referencesClark, J. S., Porath, S., Thiele, J., & Jobe, M. (2020). Action research. New Prairie Press.spa
dcterms.referencesCoates, H. (2005) The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance. Quality in Higher Education. 11 (1), pp. 25–36spa
dcterms.referencesCongreso de Colombia. (2006). Código de Infancia y Adolescencia. Portal ICBF - Instituto Colombiano De Bienestar Familiar ICBF. Retrieved September 28, 2022, from https://www.icbf.gov.co/sites/default/files/codigoinfancialey1098.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesCouncil of Europe. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.spa
dcterms.referencesDewi, R. S., Kultsum, U., & Armadi, A. (2017). Using Communicative Games in Improving Students' Speaking Skills. English Language Teaching, 10(1), 63-71.spa
dcterms.referencesDiana, N. P. R. (2010). The advantages and disadvantages of using games in teaching vocabulary to the third graders of top school elementary school. Final Project Report. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University.spa
dcterms.referencesDwiyantii, N. (2009). The Improvement of students’ speaking skill through guessing games technique. Jakarta: English Department School of teacher training and education Kusuma Negara. Retrieved May, 15, 2018.spa
dcterms.referencesEstrada, L. A. T., & Ortega, D. V. (2016). Teaching speaking skill through language games in a fifth grade of a public school from Pereira (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Facultad de Bellas Artes y Humanidades. Licenciatura en Enseñanza de la Lengua Inglesa).spa
dcterms.referencesFossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732spa
dcterms.referencesGhazal, S., & Singh, S. (2016). Game-based language learning: activities for ESL classes with limited access to technology. ELT Voices, 6(4), 1-8.spa
dcterms.referencesHadfield, Jill. (1990). Intermediate Communicative Game. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.spa
dcterms.referencesHerazo Rivera, J. D. (2010). Authentic oral interaction in the EFL class: What it means, what it does not. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 12(1), 47-61.spa
dcterms.referencesHerliani, N. (2013). The use of guessing game to improve student’s speaking skill. ENGLISH EDUCATION, 3(1), 1201951.spa
dcterms.referencesHiep, P. H. (2000). Traditional versus modern teaching methods. Teacher‟ s Edition, 2, 20- 24spa
dcterms.referencesHo, P. V. P., Thien, N. M., An, N. T. M., & Vy, N. N. H. (2020). The Effects of Using Games on EFL Students’ Speaking Performances. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(1).spa
dcterms.referencesHolmes, D. (2004). Speaking activities for the classroom. Chulalongkorn University Press.spa
dcterms.referencesHumanez, L. E. G., & Rios, N. R. A. (2009). Enhancing oral interaction in English as a foreign language through task-based learning activities. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(2).spa
dcterms.referencesIbarra, S. (2002). Understanding the task-based approach in communicative classroom teaching. INTERLENGUAJES, 3 (2), 44- 51.spa
dcterms.referencesLinneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative research journal.spa
dcterms.referencesLonghurst, R. (2003). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Key methods in geography, 3(2), 143-156.spa
dcterms.referencesMarshall, Catherine & Rossman, Gretchen B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.spa
dcterms.referencesMorse, J.M., Field, P.A. (1996). The purpose of qualitative research. In: Nursing Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4471-9_1spa
dcterms.referencesNylund, S., & Wernersson, A. (2005). Second language acquisition through verbal communication: a study of how senior high school students acquire the English language.spa
dcterms.referencesPrabavathi, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Effective oral and written communication. J. Appl. Adv. Res, 3(S1), 29.spa
dcterms.referencesRapoport, R. N. (1970). Three Dilemmas in Action Research: With Special Reference to the Tavistock Experience. Human Relations, 23(6), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677002300601spa
dcterms.referencesRodríguez Torres, J. (2017). Oral interaction through cooperative games. Roohi. Methodology of teaching - A glimpse of effective teaching techniques. Int J Appl Res 2016;2(12):86-88.spa
dcterms.referencesRoschelle, J. (2000). Choosing and using video equipment for data collection. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, 709-729.spa
dcterms.referencesSilvers, S. M. (1982, April). Games for the classroom and the English-speaking club. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 29-33).spa
dcterms.referencesVaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405.spa
dcterms.referencesWahyuni, S., & Yulianti, F. (2016). the Use of Guessing Game to Improve Student’s Speaking Skill. Getsempena English Education Journal, 3(2), 12-22.spa
dcterms.referencesWonica, P. (2017). Learning to evaluate analog games for education. In Analog game studies (Vol. 2, pp. 61–67). https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/pstoragecmu348901238291901/12212546/AnalogGameStudiesVolume2.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesWright, A., Betteridge, D., & Buckby, M. (1997). Games for Language Learning: New Edition. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.spa
dcterms.referencesYusnita, Rani (2016) SEMI-STRUCTURED SPEAKING GAMES AND MATERIALS TO DEVELOP YOUNG LEARNERS’ AUTOMATICITY AND FLUENCY. In: The 61 TEFLIN International Conference, 2016, Universitas Sebelas Maret.spa
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
archilaruidiazandrescamilo.pdf
Tamaño:
1.49 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
AutorizaciónPublicación.pdf
Tamaño:
349.45 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.48 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
E.D.A. Trabajos de Investigación y/o Extensión