Publicación:
Internship at saber pro cross curricular competencies: english course

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorVega Calao, Yina Margarita
dc.contributor.authorMorales Orozco, Angélica
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T01:54:59Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T01:54:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-07
dc.description.abstractThis report describes the internship conducted at Cross Curricular Competencies’ courses in the frame of Saber Pro University of Cordoba Institutional Program. It aims to enhance students’ results on Saber Pro National Test while taking the English course to foster students’ reading skills and meliorate their development on the standard test. This internship was implemented in a student-centered e-learning course and follows a flipped instruction method, which used self-recorded videos and personalized learning guides for the asynchronous phase, and interactive activities and discussions for the synchronous online meetings. The use of ICT was valuable to deliver the English courses through an LMS and reduce transactional distance and sense of isolation resulted from the E-approach. Finally, it discusses the findings, pedagogical gains, conclusions, and limitations faced during this meaningful experience.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado(a) en Educación Básica con Énfasis en Humanidades-Inglésspa
dc.description.modalityMonografía
dc.description.tableofcontentsI. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................9spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsII. PEDAGOGIES ................................................................................................... 11spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1. Student-Centered approach ............................................................................... 11spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2. E-learning......................................................................................................... 13spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2.1. Flipped instruction ........................................................................................ 15spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2.2. Information and communication technologies (ICT) ..................................... 17spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3. Transactional distance ...................................................................................... 18spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4. Learning Management System (LMS) .............................................................. 20spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsIII. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................ 22spa
dc.description.tableofcontents3.1. Duties chart ...................................................................................................... 26spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsIV. FINDINGS.......................................................................................................... 27spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................. 38spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsVI. LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................. 40spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsREFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 43spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsAPPENDIX ................................................................................................................... 51spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/3775
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Educación y Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeMontería, Córdoba, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Educación Básica con Énfasis en Humanidades-Inglésspa
dc.rightsCopyright Universidad de Córdoba, 2020spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.keywordsSaber Proeng
dc.subject.keywordsReading skillseng
dc.subject.keywordsE-learningeng
dc.subject.keywordsFlipped instructioneng
dc.subject.keywordsICTeng
dc.subject.keywordsLearning guideseng
dc.subject.keywordsVideo lectureseng
dc.subject.keywordsTransactional distanceeng
dc.subject.proposalE-learningspa
dc.subject.proposalSaber Prospa
dc.subject.proposalHabilidades de lecturaspa
dc.subject.proposalTICspa
dc.subject.proposalGuías de lecturaspa
dc.subject.proposalInstrucción invertidaspa
dc.subject.proposalDistancia transaccionalspa
dc.subject.proposalClases por videospa
dc.titleInternship at saber pro cross curricular competencies: english coursespa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TPspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionspa
dcterms.referencesAbuzahra, N., Farrah, M. A. H., & Zalloum, S. (2016). Using cartoon in language classroom from a constructivist point of view. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2822995spa
dcterms.referencesAlgahtani, A.F. (2011). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the E-learning Experience in Some Universities in Saudi Arabia from Male Students' Perceptions [Doctoral thesis, Durham University]. Durham E-Theses Online. https://bit.ly/32y5qJxspa
dcterms.referencesAnderson, T. D. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 129–144). Erlbaum.spa
dcterms.referencesAslani, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2015). Teaching grammar to Iranian EFL learners through blended learning using multimedia softwares. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(8), 76-87. https://bit.ly/3piIYxWspa
dcterms.referencesArman, M. (2019). Student-centered approach to teaching English language: Students' voices & choices. Ahfad Journal, 36(2), 43-50. https://bit.ly/3ll6fNispa
dcterms.referencesAzcorra Saloña, A., Bernardos Cano, C. J., Gallego Gómez, Ó., & Soto Campos, I. (2001). Informe sobre el estado de la teleeducación en España. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III. https://bit.ly/2JTIsWRspa
dcterms.referencesBorg, M., & Shapiro, S. (1996). Personality type and student performance in principles of economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 27(1), 3-25. https://bit.ly/3lol0z4spa
dcterms.referencesBransford, J., Donovan, S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academies Press. https://bit.ly/2GRrPKtspa
dcterms.referencesBrown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Addison Wesely Longman.spa
dcterms.referencesChiu, C. M., Chiu, C. S., & Chang, H. C. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention. Information systems journal, 17(3), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00238.xspa
dcterms.referencesCorley, M. (2008). Professional Development Module, Student-Centered Learning. California Adult Literacy Professional Development Project. https://bit.ly/38xvZTdspa
dcterms.referencesFalloon, G. (2011). Making the connection: Moore’s theory of transactional distance and its relevance to the use of a virtual classroom in postgraduate online teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782569spa
dcterms.referencesGautreau, C. (2011). Motivational factors affecting the integration of a learning management system by faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 8(1), n1. https://bit.ly/36uAYRQspa
dcterms.referencesGibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit.spa
dcterms.referencesGosmire, D., Van Osdel, J., & Morrison, M. (2009). Perceptions of synchronous chat tools in an online course. [Conference]. National Educational Computing Conference 2009, Washington DC, USA. https://bit.ly/32CY8V8spa
dcterms.referencesGrabinski, K., Kedzior, M., Krasodomska, J., & Herdan, A. (2020). Embedding e-Learning in accounting modules: The educators’ perspective. Education Sciences, 10(4), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040097spa
dcterms.referencesHabeeb, K. T. (2019). E-learning platform/learning management system in education. International Journal of Reflective Researchin Social Sciences, 2(1), 64-66. https://bit.ly/3lrJCHgspa
dcterms.referencesHayes, B. (2000). An experiment using teacher centered instruction versus student centered instruction as a means of teaching American government to high school seniors. Armuchee High School–American Government classes. https://bit.ly/36uefFospa
dcterms.referencesHermans, R., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & education, 51(4), 1499-1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001spa
dcterms.referencesJaya, J. (2019). Students' perceptions on the use of Learning Management System (LMS) in English Department: advantages and disadvantages [Doctoral dissertation, Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya]. Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository. https://bit.ly/3eQk6c4spa
dcterms.referencesHenninger M.L., Richardson K.P. (2016). Engaging students in quality games. Strategies, 29(3), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2016.1159150spa
dcterms.referencesInstituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación (Ed.) (2017) Saber pro competencias específicas: Módulo de evaluar. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. https://bit.ly/3ko6SEospa
dcterms.referencesKim, M., Kim, S., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003spa
dcterms.referencesKomarnicki, J. K. (2014). How do they fare? a study of learning achievement and satisfaction with blended learning for traditional-age undergraduates at moderately selective colleges [Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://bit.ly/3njk1kjspa
dcterms.referencesLage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759spa
dcterms.referencesLeo, J. 2007. The Student-Centered classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/2IjoDYVspa
dcterms.referencesLiaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1906-1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.002spa
dcterms.referencesLonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers & education, 53(3), 686-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008spa
dcterms.referencesMartins, C. B., Steil, A. V., & Todesco, J. L. (2004). Factors influencing the adoption of the Internet as a teaching tool at foreign language schools. Computers & Education, 42(4), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.007spa
dcterms.referencesMathews, L. (2018). Effectively preparing secondary foreign language students: A study on the effectiveness of the teacher-centered and the student-centered approach. [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://bit.ly/3prDUHRspa
dcterms.referencesMoore, M. (1991). Editorial: Distance education theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649109526758spa
dcterms.referencesMoore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systematic view of online learning. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.spa
dcterms.referencesMoore, L. L. (2003). Leadership in the cooperative extension system: An examination of leadership styles and skills of state directors and administrators [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://bit.ly/2GSN4LPspa
dcterms.referencesMullinix, B., & McCurry, D. (2003). Balancing the learning equation: Exploring effective mixtures of technology, teaching and learning. The Technology Source. https://bit.ly/2Im3WLUspa
dcterms.referencesNorth Central Regional Educational Laboratory (Ed.) (2006). Student-centered approach. https://bit.ly/38xvPLBspa
dcterms.referencesOzkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011spa
dcterms.referencesRichardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings. (pp. 3-14). Falmer Press.spa
dcterms.referencesRosenberg, M. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. McGraw-Hill Companies.spa
dcterms.referencesSadownik, S. A. (2018). Under Construction: Developing Mathematical Processes and Discourse Through Dialogue in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. TSpace Repository. https://bit.ly/38BHwRwspa
dcterms.referencesSchullo, S., Hilbelink, A., Venable, M., & Barron, A. E. (2007). Selecting a virtual classroom system: Elluminate live vs. Macromedia breeze (adobe acrobat connect professional). MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 331-345. https://bit.ly/3kkNx7bspa
dcterms.referencesSerin, H. (2018). A Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Approaches in Educational Settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies,5(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i1p164spa
dcterms.referencesSharma, P., & Kaur, M. (2013). Classification in pattern recognition: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(4), 298-306. https://bit.ly/2Ir8S1Jspa
dcterms.referencesShephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00328spa
dcterms.referencesSiemens, G.; Gaševi´c, D.; Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the Digital University: A Review of the History and Current State of Distance, Blended, and Online Learning. https://bit.ly/3eXqoa0spa
dcterms.referencesSo, H., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009spa
dcterms.referencesSouza, A. R. B. D. (2005). Movimento didático na educação à distância: análise e prospecções. [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global Doctoral dissertation. https://bit.ly/35kRXGQspa
dcterms.referencesSpiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Feltovich, P. L., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational technology, 31(5), 24-33. https://bit.ly/2IsAaEKspa
dcterms.referencesStein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_4spa
dcterms.referencesTalbert, R. (2013). Learning MATLAB in the inverted classroom. The ASEE Computers in Education (CoED) Journal, 4(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21640spa
dcterms.referencesTalebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education: advantages, disadvantages, conveniences and limitations of applying e-learning to agricultural students in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.199spa
dcterms.referencesTheroux, P. (2004). Comparing traditional teaching and student centered, collaborative learning. Enhance Learning with Technology. https://bit.ly/36qg1aOspa
dcterms.referencesRogers, C. (1983) Freedom to learn for the 80s. Merrill Publishing Company. https://bit.ly/3ktxrIIspa
dcterms.referencesTwigg C. (2002). Quality, cost and access: the case for redesign. In M.S. Pittinsky (Ed.) The Wired Tower (pp. 111–143). Prentice-Hall.spa
dcterms.referencesYoung, J. R. (1997). Rethinking the role of the professor in an age of high-tech tools. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(6). https://bit.ly/3pnerimspa
dcterms.referencesZainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274spa
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
moralesorozcoangelica.pdf
Tamaño:
3.24 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
AutorizaciónPublicación_Angélica C Morales Orozco.pdf
Tamaño:
399.48 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.48 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
E.D.A. Trabajos de Investigación y/o Extensión