Publicación:
Implementing Clil In Social Science class activities in English to foster the development of higher order thinking skills in 4th graders

dc.contributor.advisorBoccia, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Meza, María Auxiliadora
dc.contributor.juryHerrera Naranjo, Sol Jashmed
dc.contributor.juryCalle-Díaz, Luzkarime
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-03T22:32:14Z
dc.date.available2025-09-03
dc.date.available2024-09-03T22:32:14Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-03
dc.description.abstractContent Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has been widely used as a teaching approach to teach language through content. Despite its diverse implementations to teach content knowledge and language simultaneously worldwide, little is known about the application of CLIL to foster higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). According to Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) in their revision of Bloom's taxonomy in 1956 this relationship remains unexplored, particularly in Social Sciences activities conducted in English in primary grades. This study aimed to explore the implementation of CLIL in Social Sciences activities in English in a Bilingual School to help 4th graders foster HOTS. Data was collected by applying a CLIL lesson plan mediated by Task-Based Learning (TBL) that consists of a macro-task, a set of micro-tasks, and a final task. This final activity consisted of creating an environmental magazine by the participants. The written discourse produced by each student was analyzed individually, drawing upon Taylor's approach to discourse analysis (2012) . Findings showed that the participants successfully developed HOTS during this study. The results revealed specific instances of student's cognitive skills development through their written work. The results obtained supported the effectiveness of the methodological decision made, such as drawing on Bloom's Taxonomy to establish learning objectives and measure the student's learning, and integrating CLIL with TBL. The strengths and weaknesses identified in students' cognitive skill development underscore the need to carefully consider task design and instructional strategies in future CLIL implementations. The findings of this research have the potential to inform other educators about the benefits and challenges of implementing CLIL to foster students' HOTS in Social Sciences activities in English.eng
dc.description.abstractEl aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lenguas (CLIL, por sus siglas en inglés) se ha utilizado ampliamente como método de enseñanza para enseñar lenguas a través de contenidos. A pesar de sus diversas implementaciones para enseñar conocimientos de contenidos y lenguas simultáneamente en todo el mundo, se sabe poco sobre la aplicación de CLIL para fomentar las habilidades de pensamiento de orden superior (HOTS, por sus siglas en inglés) de la taxonomía de Bloom (1956), revisada por Anderson y Krathwohl (2001) , y sigue sin explorarse, en particular en actividades de Ciencias Sociales realizadas en inglés en los grados primarios. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo explorar la implementación de CLIL en actividades de Ciencias Sociales en inglés en una escuela bilingüe para ayudar a los estudiantes de 4º grado a desarrollar las HOTS. Los datos se recopilaron aplicando un plan de lección CLIL mediado por el aprendizaje basado en tareas (TBL, por sus siglas en inglés) que consta de una macrotarea, un conjunto de microtareas y una tarea final. Esta actividad final consistió en crear una revista ambiental por parte de los participantes. La producción escrita de cada estudiante se analizó individualmente, basándose en el análisis del discurso según lo propone Taylor, 2013. Los hallazgos mostraron que los participantes desarrollaron con éxito las HOTS durante su participación en las actividades propuestas. Los resultados revelaron casos específicos de desarrollo de las habilidades cognitivas de los estudiantes a través de su trabajo escrito. El análisis reflejó que las decisiones metodológicas de este estudio, fueron adecuadas tales como el uso de la Taxonomía de Bloom para establecer objetivos de aprendizaje y medir el aprendizaje de los estudiantes, además de integrar CLIL con TBL. Las fortalezas y debilidades identificadas en el desarrollo de las habilidades cognitivas de los estudiantes subrayan la necesidad de considerar cuidadosamente el diseño de tareas y las estrategias de instrucción en futuras implementaciones de CLIL. Los hallazgos de esta investigación tienen el potencial de informar a otros educadores sobre los beneficios y desafíos de implementar CLIL para fomentar habilidades de pensamiento de alto orden en los estudiantes en actividades de Ciencias Sociales en inglés.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMaestría en Enseñanza del Inglés
dc.description.modalityTrabajos de Investigación y/o Extensión
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introductioneng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.Theoretical Frameworkeng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1 Social Sciences in Educationeng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2 Content and Language Integrated Learningeng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3 Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domaineng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4 Task-Based Learningeng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.1 Macro-taskeng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.2 Micro-taskeng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.3 Final-taskeng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.5 Literature Revieweng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.5.1 International Contexteng
dc.description.tableofcontents2.5.2 National Contexteng
dc.description.tableofcontents3. Methodologyeng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.1 Research designeng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.3 Data Collection Methodseng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.4 Data Analysis Procedureeng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.5 Validation of the Explicit and Implicit Evidence of HOTS development in students in Data Analysiseng
dc.description.tableofcontents3.6 Ethical Considerationseng
dc.description.tableofcontents4. Findingseng
dc.description.tableofcontents5. Discussion 65eng
dc.description.tableofcontents6. Conclusionseng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Córdoba
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Universidad de Córdoba
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/8657
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdoba
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Educación y Ciencias Humanas
dc.publisher.placeMontería, Córdoba, Colombia
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Educación Básica con Énfasis en Humanidades-Inglés
dc.relation.referencesAcademy of Social Sciences. (2024). What is Social Science? https://acss.org.uk/what-is-social-science/
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition.
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. https://lc.cx/Hnq4yP
dc.relation.referencesBogardus, E. S. (1913). An introduction to Social Science. In Introduction to social science: A textbook outline (Vol. 1, Ch. 1, p. 7). University of Southern California, Department of Economy and Sociology.
dc.relation.referencesBogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn and Bacon.
dc.relation.referencesBritish Council. (2020). TBL - Task Based Learning.
dc.relation.referencesBunmak, N. (2017). The influence of task-based learning on elt in asean context. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 10(1), 201-209. https://lc.cx/bG0tRh
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesCampillo, J., Sánchez, R., & Miralles, P. (2019). Primary Teachers' Perceptions of CLIL Implementation in Spain. English language teaching, 12(4), 149-156. Carpendale, J., & Lewis, C. (2020) What makes us human: How minds develop through social interactions. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesCevasco, J., & Buralli, K. (2023). Construction of coherence in the comprehension of narratives: Studies on the importance of the establishment of causal connections, gaps in current research and future directions. Papeles del Psicólogo, 44(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol.3010
dc.relation.referencesChristensen, T. (2022). Observing and interpreting quality in social science teaching. Journal of Social Science Education, 21(2), 128-152.
dc.relation.referencesCoyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL - Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. Duarte, S., & Cruz, M. (2017). From and beyond gamified activities in primary English Learning. Paper presented at the Challenges Conference 2017, Bragal
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. Pearson
dc.relation.referencesCruz, M. (2021). CLIL approach and the fostering of “creactical skills” towards a global sustainable awareness. MEXTESOL Journal, 45(2).
dc.relation.referencesDurga, S. S., & Rao, C. S. (2018). Developing students' writing skills in the English process approach. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-5.
dc.relation.referencesEllison, M. (2019). CLIL in the primary school context. In S. G. Copland (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners. Retrieved from https://lc.cx/uUeLKB
dc.relation.referencesENVIRONMENT. Primer Seminario de E-Learning en la Didáctica de los Idiomas Extranjeros. ENVIRONMENT. Primer Seminario de E-Learning en la Didáctica de los Idiomas Extranjeros. ENVIRONMENT. Primer Seminario de E-Learning en la Didáctica de los Idiomas Extranjeros.
dc.relation.referencesFerrance, E. (2000). Action research. LAB, Northeast and Island Regional Education Laboratory at Brown University.
dc.relation.referencesForehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, 41(4), 47-56.
dc.relation.referencesGraham, K. M., Sharon, M., & Zohreh, E. (2020). Using children’s literature to teach the 4Cs of CLIL: A systematic review of EFL studies. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(2), 163-189.
dc.relation.referencesHalimah, L., Subekti, E., Hidayah, Y., & Kartika, D. (2020). Improving Critical Thinking Ability through Social Studies Learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research (IJMCER), 2(4), 132-144. Retrieved from https://lc.cx/qNEfr_
dc.relation.referencesHanesova, D. (2014). Development of critical and creative thinking skills in CLIL. Journal of language and cultural education, 2(2), 33-51. Retrieved from https://lc.cx/ZL0vsw
dc.relation.referencesHuertas, S. P., & Rojas, Y. J. M. (2014). OPTIMIZING EFL COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCES THROUGH DIGITAL TOOLS IN A CLIL
dc.relation.referencesIoannou-Georgiou, S., & Pavlou, P. (2011). Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education.
dc.relation.referencesKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.
dc.relation.referencesKinoshita, H. (2022). Teaching of Critical Thinking Skills by Science Teachers in Japanese Primary Schools. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(5), 801-816. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.801
dc.relation.referencesLee, I., Jongwon, P., & Yoon, H.-G. (2022). Science teachers' theory-based teaching: Connecting a learning cycle model to a lesson plan. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(3), 462-480. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.462
dc.relation.referencesLlinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). The role of different tasks in CLIL students' use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69-79.
dc.relation.referencesLoaiza Massuh, E. M. de L., Salazar Torres, P. M., Salazar Torres, M. A., Montece Ochoa, S. K., Veliz Blacio, J. J., & Acosta Mora, M. G. (2019). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): An educational and communicative approach for Ecuatorians. Mawil Publicaciones de Ecuador.
dc.relation.referencesMarino, E., & Hansen, L. (2007). Strategies for teaching social studies to English-language learners at the elementary level. The Social Studies, 98(5), 180-184. https://doi.org/ Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for Producing CLIL Learning Material. Encuentro, 21, 15-33. https://doi.org/https://lc.cx/CTingS
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. https://lc.cx/vl-t6a
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2016). Colombiaaprende. Retrieved from https://lc.cx/siZ77C
dc.relation.referencesMoriarty, J. (2011). Qualitative methods overview. Methods Review. NIHR School for Social Care Research.
dc.relation.referencesMurphy, J. (2003). Task-based learning: The interaction between tasks and learners. ELT Journal, 57(4), 352-360.
dc.relation.referencesNijhawan, S., Elsner, D., & Engartner, T. (2021). The Construction of Cosmopolitan Glocalities in Secondary Classrooms through Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in the Social Sciences. Global Education Review, 8 (2-3)((2-3)), 92-115. https://doi.org/https://lc.cx/FZBF_Z
dc.relation.referencesNitta, R., & Yamamoto, Y. (2020). Reconceptualizing CLIL from transformative pedagogy perspective: Pilot debate study in English language curriculum. Retrieved from
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. http://www.cambridge.org
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz-Garcia, W. R., & Navarrete-Villarraga, Z. C. (2024). Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to Analyze the Scope of CLIL Classes with Children. HOW, 31(1), 11-35. Özdemir, F. (2022). Opinions of social studies teachers on environmental education through social studies curriculum and textbooks. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 486-501. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.125.9.5
dc.relation.referencesQasrawi, R., & BeniAbdelrahman, A. (2020). The higher and lower-order thinking skills (HOTS and LOTS) in Unlock English textbooks (1st and 2nd editions) based on Bloom's taxonomy: An analysis study. Semanticscholar. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Higher-and-Lower-Order-Thinking-Skills-%28HOTS-in-Qasrawi-BeniAbdelrahman/e4646e1e0af52a56acdd76efb8c76cae702e738b
dc.relation.referencesÖztürk, G. (2021). Pre-service teachers' skills in analysing achievements in regard to the revised Bloom's taxonomy. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(1), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.329.18
dc.relation.referencesPardede, P. (2019). Seeing action research process in a practice. Collegiate Forum, 282-295. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.462
dc.relation.referencesPavon Vazquez, V., Prieto Molina, M., & Ávila López, J. (2015). Perceptions of teachers and students of the promotion of interaction through task-based activities in CLIL. Piacentini, V., Rui, M., & Simões, A. (2022). Can "Integrated Learning" with English support science education? A case study in Portugal. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6).
dc.relation.referencesQasrawi, R., & BeniAbdelrahman, A. (2020). The Higher and Lower-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS and LOTS) in Unlock English Textbooks (1st and 2nd Editions) Based on Bloom's Taxonomy: An Analysis Study. 7(3), 744-758. Retrieved from https://lc.cx/VgBXBI
dc.relation.referencesRani, D., & Inamdar, N. (2022). . Content and Language Integrated Learning in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain: Exploring Pedagogical Practices and Experiences through Classroom Observations. Issues and Ideas in Education, 10(1), 39-47.
dc.relation.referencesRitchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://books.google.com
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez Bonces, M. (2011). CLILL: Colombia leading into content language learning. ÍKALA, Revista de lenguaje y cultura, 16(28), 79-89.
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez, J. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Considerations. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 6, 177-189.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Gallego, M. (2014). Lesson planning in primary and secondary education. ResearchGate.
dc.relation.referencesSenturk, M., & Ozge, S. (2023). The social studies and science pre-service teachers' experiences of creative comics for environmental education. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), 109-123.
dc.relation.referencesTardieu, C., & Dolitsky, M. (2012). Integrating the task-based approach to CLIL teaching. In Teaching and learning English through bilingual education (pp. 3-35).
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, S. (2013). What is discourse analysis? Bloomsbury Academic. Torres-Rincón, J. C., & Cuesta-Medina, L. M. (2019). Situated practice in CLIL: Voices from Colombian teachers. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 18, 109-141. Situated practice in CLIL: Voices from Colombian teachers. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 18, 109-141.
dc.relation.referencesÜrey, M., Çolak, K., Bozdemir, Y., & Kaymakci, S. (2020). Comparison of prospective science and social studies teachers' knowledge levels of and misconceptions about atmospheric environmental problems. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10(2), 216-236. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069
dc.relation.referencesVonkova, H., & Moore, A. (2021). Motivation of Students for English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current Research Foci in Different Countries. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, 19(3), 91-97. Retrieved from https://lc.cx/mAZnro
dc.relation.referencesYaguara, J., Villalobos, N., & Otálora, J. (2021). Exploring the implementation of CLIL in an EFL virtual learning environment. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 14(2), 187-214.
dc.relation.referencesYavuz, A., Öztüfekçi, A., Ören, A. D., Kaplan, A., & Uzunkaya, Ç. Y. (2020). Teachers' Perceptions and Needs of CLIL: A Collective Case Study from Turkey. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(1), 92-103
dc.rightsCopyright Universidad de Córdoba, 2024
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordsContent and language integrated learning (CLIL)eng
dc.subject.keywordsSocial scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsBloom's taxonomyeng
dc.subject.keywordsTask based learning approacheng
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje integrado de contenido y lengua (CLIL)spa
dc.subject.proposalCiencias socialesspa
dc.subject.proposalTaxonomía de bloomspa
dc.subject.proposalEnfoque de aprendizaje basado en tareasspa
dc.titleImplementing Clil In Social Science class activities in English to foster the development of higher order thinking skills in 4th graderseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
DiazMezaMariaAuxiliadora.pdf
Tamaño:
1.6 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Formato de autorización.pdf
Tamaño:
414.3 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
15.18 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Colecciones