Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBetancur H, Oscarspa
dc.contributor.authorBetancourt E, Antoniospa
dc.contributor.authorEstrada A, Juliánspa
dc.contributor.authorHenao U, Franciscospa
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-04 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-17T20:07:56Z
dc.date.available2016-01-04 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-17T20:07:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-04
dc.identifier.issn0122-0268
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/5245
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/33spa
dc.subjectacteriaspa
dc.subjectmouldspa
dc.subjectparasitespa
dc.subjectvirusspa
dc.subjectyeastspa
dc.titlePersistence of pathogens in liquid pig manure processed in manure tanks and biodigestersspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.identifier.doi10.21897/rmvz.33
dc.relation.referencesMcGlone JJ. The future of pork production in the world: towards sustainable, welfare-positive systems. Animals 2013; 3(2):401-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani3020401spa
dc.relation.referencesAsociación Colombiana de Porcicultores. Análisis de coyuntura del sector porcícola a-o 2013. Porcicul Colomb 2014; 3(2):16-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesPell AN. Manure and microbes: public and animal health problem? J Dairy Sci 1997; 80(10):2673-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76227-1spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy G, Lawlor PG, Gutierrez M, Gardiner GE. Assessing the biosafety risks of pig manure for use as a feedstock for composting. Sci Total Environ 2013; 463-464:712-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.069spa
dc.relation.referencesGoss M, Richards C. Development of a risk-based index for source water protection planning, which supports the reduction of pathogens from agricultural activity entering water resources. J Environ Manage 2008; 87(4):623-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.048spa
dc.relation.referencesFongaro G, Viancelli A, Magri ME, Elmahdy EM, Biesus LL, Kich JD, et al. Utility of specific biomarkers to assess safety of swine manure for biofertilizing purposes. Sci Total Environ 2014; 479-480:277-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.004spa
dc.relation.referencesRivas O, Vargas F, Watson G. Biodigestores: factores químicos, físicos y biológicos relacionados con su productividad. Tecnol March 2010; 23(1):39-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuong LQ, Madsen H, Anh le X, Ngoc PT, Dalsgaard A. Hygienic aspects of livestock manure management and biogas systems operated by small-scale pig farmers in Vietnam. Sci Total Environ 2014; 470-471:53-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.023spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith SR, Lang NL, Cheung KH, Spanoudaki K. Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes. Waste Manag 2005; 25(4):417-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.02.010spa
dc.relation.referencesAppels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, Dewil R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2008; 34(6):755–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002spa
dc.relation.referencesOlugasa TT, Odesola IF, Oyewola MO. Energy production from biogas: A conceptual review for use in Nigeria. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2014; 32:770-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.013spa
dc.relation.referencesMasse D, Gilbert Y, Topp E. Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure. Bioresour. Technol 2011; 102(2):641-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.020spa
dc.relation.referencesChen Y, Fu B, Wang Y, Jiang Q, Liu H. Reactor performance and bacterial pathogen removal in response to sludge retention time in a mesophilic anaerobic digester treating sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 106:20-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.093spa
dc.relation.referencesEstrada- Alvarez J, Gómez-Londo-o G, Jaramillo-Jimenez A. Efecto del biodigestor plástico de flujo continuo en el tratamiento de aguas residuales de establos bovinos. Vet Zootec 2008; 2(2):9-20.spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). Norma Técnica Colombiana NTC-ISO 5667-1. Gestión ambiental, Calidad del agua, Muestreo, Directrices para el dise-o de programas de muestreo. Bogotá, Colombia: ICONTEC; 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang C, Hung JJ, Wu CY, Chien MS. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of Pseudorabies Virus, Porcine Parvovirus and Porcine Circoviruses. Vet Microbiol 2004;101(3):209-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.04.007spa
dc.relation.referencesUrbaniak K, Markowska-Daniel I. Application of PCR based on apxIVA gene for rapid detection of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2011; 55(4):609-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesAsawakarn S, Watanaphansak S, Asawakarn T. Report of Lawsonia intracellularis Infection in Dogs by Polymerase Chain Reaction. Thai J Vet Med 2012; 42(4):523-26.spa
dc.relation.referencesLurchachaiwong W, Payungporn S, Srisatidnarakul U, Mungkundar C, Theamboonlers A, Poovorawan Y. Rapid detection and strain identification of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) by real-time RT-PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 2008; 46(1):55-60.spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA). Directiva DIP–30-100-003. Directivas técnicas de alimentos para animales y sales mineralizadas. Alimentos para animales, parámetros microbiológicos. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. [en línea] 1999. [acceso julio de 2014] URL disponible en: http://www.ica.gov.co/getdoc/7d27ee5e-cfe4-47a2-868e-7c53f4e49473/Directivastecnicasalimentosanimales.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Nacional de Salud, Ministerio de la Protección Social. Evaluación de riesgos de Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxigénico en alimentos preparados no industriales en Colombia. Imprenta Nacional de Colombia. [en línea] 2011. [acceso julio de 2014] URL disponible en: http://www.ins.gov.co/lineas-de-accion/investigacion/ueria/Publicaciones/ER%20STAPHYLOCOCCUS.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesGilbert RJ, de Louvois J, Donovan T, Little C, Nye K, Ribeiro CD, et al. Guidelines for the microbiological quality of some ready-to-eat foods sampled at the point of sale. Commun Dis Public Health 2000; 3(3):163-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesTurner C, Burton CH. The inactivation of viruses in pig slurries: a review. Bioresour. Technol 1997; 61(1):9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)84693-7spa
dc.relation.referencesCa-on-Franco WA, Henao-Agudelo RA, Pérez-Bedoya JL. Recovery of gastrointestinal swine parasites in anaerobic biodigester systems. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2012; 21(3):249-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000300013spa
dc.relation.referencesPark K, Thompson A, Marinier M, Clark K, Wagner-Riddle C. Greenhouse gas emissions from stored liquid swine manure in a cold climate. Atmos Environ 2006; 40(4): 618-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.075spa
dc.relation.referencesSon TTD, Truong DV, Madsen H, Dalsgaard A. Survival of faecal indicator bacteria in treated pig manure stored in clay-covered heaps in Vietnam. Vet Microbiol 2011; 152(3-4):374-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.05.004spa
dc.relation.referencesPoudel RC, Joshi DR, Dhakal NR, Karki AB. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge mixture for the reduction of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms. Sci World 2010; 8(8):47-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/sw.v8i8.3848spa
dc.relation.referencesCao Y, Chang Z, Wang J, Ma Y, Fu G. The fate of antagonistic microorganisms and antimicrobial substances during anaerobic digestion of pig and dairy manure. Bioresour. Technol 2013; 136:664-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.052spa
dc.relation.referencesHuong LQ, Forslund A, Madsen H, Dalsgaard A. Survival of Salmonella spp. and fecal indicator bacteria in Vietnamese biogas digesters receiving pig slurry. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2014; 217(7):785-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.04.004spa
dc.relation.referencesPourcher AM, Ziebal C, Kervarrec M, Bioteau T, Dabert P. Sanitary status of 44 hog manures in Brittany: comparison of the effectiveness of manure treatments based on the levels of indicator bacteria and two pathogenic bacteria. J Agr Sci Tech 2012; 3(A2):303-13.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.33
dc.identifier.eissn1909-0544
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/33/66
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/33/67
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2016 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 21(1) Enero-abril 2016spa
dc.relation.citationendpage5249
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage5237
dc.relation.citationvolume21spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista MVZ Córdobaspa
dc.title.translatedPersistence of pathogens in liquid pig manure processed in manure tanks and biodigesterseng
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Rev MVZ Córdoba-33.pdf393.2Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/