Publicación:
Tratamiento de efluentes: una vía para la acuicultura responsable

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorPardo, Sandraspa
dc.contributor.authorSuárez, Héctorspa
dc.contributor.authorSoriano, Eduardospa
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-30 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T21:00:27Z
dc.date.available2006-07-30 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-07-01T21:00:27Z
dc.date.issued2006-07-30
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.21897/rmvz.1041
dc.identifier.eissn1909-0544
dc.identifier.issn0122-0268
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/5856
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1041
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1041/1274
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. Supl , Año 2006 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 11(Supl) Julio 2006spa
dc.relation.citationendpage29
dc.relation.citationissueSuplspa
dc.relation.citationstartpage20
dc.relation.citationvolume11spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista MVZ Córdobaspa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-FAO. Rome, Italy 2004; 153.spa
dc.relation.referencesPillay T. The challenges of sustainable aquaculture. World aquaculture, 1996; 27: 7-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. Desarrollo de la acuicultura. Orientaciones técnicas para la pesca responsable Nº 5. FAO. Roma, Italia. 1999; 54.spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuicultura (INPA). Boletín estadístico pesquero y acuícola. Bogotá, Colombia. 1998; 35.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernandez-Rodríguez A, Alceste-Oliviero C, Sanchez R, Jory D, Vidal L, Constain- Franco L. Aquaculture development trends in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Subasinghe RP, Bueno P, Phillips MJ, Hough C, McGladdery SE, Arthur JR. (eds). Technical Proceedings of the Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Millennium, Bangkok. NACA and FAO 2001; 317-340.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. Aquaculture development. FAO Fisheries Circular 1997; 815 (rev. 8).spa
dc.relation.referencesCMMAD. Nosso Futuro Comum. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas. 1991.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. Informe de la Consulta de Expertos sobre el Propuesto Subcomité de Acuicultura del Comité de Pesca. Bangkok, Tailandia, 28-29 de febrero de 2000. FAO Informe de Pesca 2000; 623: 1-39.spa
dc.relation.referencesVinatea L. Aqüicultura e desenvolvimento sustentável. Edit UFSC Brasil 1999; 310.spa
dc.relation.referencesNew M. Responsible aquaculture: is this a special challenge for developing countries? World Aquaculture 2003; 34: 49-52.spa
dc.relation.referencesPapoutsoglou S. Impact of aquaculture on the aquatic environment in relation to applied production systems. In: De Pauw N, Joyce J. (eds.). Aquaculture and Environment. Dublin, Ireland. European Aquaculture Society Spec Publ 1991; 16: 71-78.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd C. Shrimp pond bottom soil and sediment management. In: Wyban J. (ed.). World Aquaculture' 92–Special Session on Shrimp Farming. Anais…Baton Rouge: The World Aquaculture Society 1992; 166 181.spa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta-Nassar M, Morell J, Corredor J. The nitrogen budget of a tropical semi-intensive freshwater fish culture pond. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 1994; 25: 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1994.tb00189.xspa
dc.relation.referencesGross A, Boyd C, Wood C. Nitrogen transformations and balance in channel catfish ponds. Aquacultural Engineering 2000; 24: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(00)00062-5spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmittou H. Situation outlook and prospects of the world’s aquaculture feed supply. In: Simpósio Internacional Sobre Nutrição de Peixes e Crustáceos, Campos de Jordão, Sao Paulo. Anais... Colégio Brasileiro de Nutrição Animal (CBNA) 1995; 9-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesFigueiredo MCB de, Araújo L, Gomes R, Rosa M, Paulino W, Morais LFS de. Environmental impacts of inland shrimp farming effluents. Eng Sanit Ambient 2005; 10: 167-174.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiedrahita R. Reducing the potencial environmental impact of tank aquaculture effluents through intensification and recirculation. Aquaculture 2003; 226: 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00465-4spa
dc.relation.referencesViadero R, Cunningham J, Semmens K, Tierney A. Effluent and production impacts of flow-through aquaculture operation in west Virginia. Aquacultural Engineering, 2005; 33: 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.004spa
dc.relation.referencesKestemont P. Different systems of carp production and their impacts on the environment. Aquaculture 1995; 129: 347-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00292-Vspa
dc.relation.referencesBillard R, Perchec G. Systems and technologies of production and processing for carp. In: Kestemont P, Billard R. (eds.). Aquaculture of freshwater species (except salmonids). Torremolinos, Spain. European Aquaculture Society Spec Publ 1993; 20: 1-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesCross T. Potential genetic interactions between reared and wild fish in Europe, with particular emphasis on Atlantic salmon. In: De Pauw N, Joyce J. (eds.). Aquaculture and Environment. Dublin, Ireland. European Aquaculture Society Spec Publ 1992; 16: 299-308.spa
dc.relation.referencesTacon A, Forster I. Aquafeeds and the environment: policy implications. Aquaculture 2003; 226:181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00476-9spa
dc.relation.referencesTroell M, Neori A, Chopin T, Buschmann AH. Biological wastewater treatment in aquaculture–more than just bacteria. World Aquaculture 2005; 36: 27-29.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeichert-Coddington D, Rouse D, Potts A, Boyd C. Treatment of harvest discharge from intensive shrimp ponds by settling. Aquacultural Engineering 1999; 19: 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(98)00047-8spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd C. Guidelines for aquaculture effluent management at the farm-level. Aquaculture 2003; 226:101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00471-Xspa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd C. The status of codes of practice in aquaculture. World Aquaculture, 2003; 34: 63-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesHopkins J, Hamilton R, Sandifer P, Browdy C, Stokes A. Effect of water exchange rate on production, water quality, effluent characteristics and nitrogen budgets os intensive shrimp ponds. J World Aquacult Soc 1993; 24: 304-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1993.tb00162.xspa
dc.relation.referencesSeok K, Leonard S, Boyd C, Schwartz M. Water quality in annually drained and in drained channel catfish ponds over a threeyear period. Progr Fish Culturist 1995; 57: 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1995)057<0052:CWQIAD>2.3.CO;2spa
dc.relation.referencesCho C, Bureau D. A review of diet formulation strategies and feeding systems to reduce excretory and feed wastes in aquaculture. Aquaculture Research 2001; 32: 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1355-557x.2001.00027.xspa
dc.relation.referencesJohan P, Watanabe T, Satoh S, Kiron V. Formulation of low phosphorus loading diets for carp (Cyprinus carpio L .) . Aquaculture Research 2001; 32: 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1355-557x.2001.00028.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBrinker A, Koppe W, Rösch R. Optimised effluent treatment by stabilised trout faeces. Aquaculture 2005; 249: 125-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.12.029spa
dc.relation.referencesTeichert-Coddington DR, Martinez D, Ramirez E, 1996. Characterization of shrimp farm effluents in Honduras and chemical budgets of selected nutrients. In: Egna H, Goetze B, Burke D, McNamara M, Clair D. (eds.). Pond Dynamics/ Aquaculture Collaborative Research Program, Thirteenth Annual Technical Report. PD/A CRSP, Office of International Research & Development, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA 1996; 70-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesGautier D, Amador J, Newmark F. The use of mangrove wetland as a biofilter to treat shrimp pond effluents: preliminary results of an experiment on the Caribbean coast of Colombia. Aquaculture Research 2004; 32: 787-799. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2001.00614.xspa
dc.relation.referencesJones A, Dennison W, Preston N. Integrated treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation, oyster filtration and macroalgal absorption: a laboratory scale study. Aquaculture 2001; 193: 155-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00486-5spa
dc.relation.referencesHussenot J, Lefebvre S, Brassard N. Openail treatment of wastewater from landbased marine fish farms in extensive and intensive systems: current technology and future perspectives. Aquatic Living Resour 1998; 11: 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(98)80015-6spa
dc.relation.referencesPorrello S, Lenzi M, Tomassetti P, Persia E, Finoia M, Mercatali I. Reduction of aquaculture wastewater eutrophication by phytotreatment ponds system: II. Nitrogen and phosphorus content in macroalgae and sediment. Aquaculture 2003; 219: 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00013-9spa
dc.relation.referencesWang J. Conceptual design of a microalgae-based recirculation oyster and shrimp system. Aquacultural Engineering 2003; 28: 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(03)00020-7spa
dc.relation.referencesAzim M, Wahab M, van Dam A, Beveridge M, Milstein A, Verdegem M. Optimization of fertilization rate for maximizing periphyton production on artificial substrates and the implications for periphyton-based aquaculture. Aquaculture Research 2001; 32: 749-760. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2001.00613.xspa
dc.relation.referencesSchulz C, Gelbrecht J, Rennert B. Treatment of rainbow trout farm effluents in constructed wetland with emergent plants and subsurface horizontal water flow. Aquaculture 2003; 217: 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00204-1spa
dc.relation.referencesBrinker A, Rösch R. Factors determining the size of suspended solids in flow-through fish farm. Aquacultural Engineering 2005; 33: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.10.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDame R, Dankers N, Prins T, Jongsma H, Smaal A. The influence of mussel beds on nutrients in the Western Wadden Sea and Eastern Scheldt Estuaries Estuaries 1991; 14: 130-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto D, Mena G. Filter feeding by the freshwater mussel, Diplodon chilensis, as a biocontrol of salmon farming eutrophication. Aquaculture 1999; 171: 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00420-7spa
dc.relation.referencesOlivera A. Os moluscos bivalves e a biorremediação dos impactos da carcinicultura. Panorama da Aquicultura 2001; 11: 37-39.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlivera A, Brito L. Treating shrimp farming effluent using the native oyster, Crassostrea rhizophorae, in Brazil. World Aquaculture 2005; 36: 60-63.spa
dc.relation.referencesLin C, Ruamthaveesub P, Wanuchsoontorn P. Integrated culture of the green mussel Perna viridis in wastewater from an intensive shrimp pond: concept and practice. World Aquaculture 1993; 24: 68-73.spa
dc.relation.referencesReeders H, Bij de Vaate A, Slim FJ. The filtration rate of Dreisseenia plyphorma (Bivalvia) in three dutch lakes with reference to biological water quality management. Freshwater Biol 1989; 22: 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1989.tb01088.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBunt C, Mac Isaac H, Sprules W. Pumping rates and projected filtering impact of juvenile Zebra Mussels (Dreisseenia polymorpha) in Western Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1993; 50: 1017-1022. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-117spa
dc.relation.referencesStuart K, Eversole A. Filtration of green algae and cyanobaceria by freschwater mussels in the partitioned aquaculture system. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 2001; 32: 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2001.tb00928.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBrix H, Schierup H. The use of the aquatic macrophytes in water-pollution control. Ambio 1989; 18: 100-107.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeisner S, Eriksson P, Granéli W, Leonardson L. Influence of macrophytes on nitrate removal in wetlands. Ambio 1994; 23: 363-366.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrister D. Organic aquaculture: moving toward national standards. World Aquaculture 2001; 32: 51 53.spa
dc.relation.referencesRakocy J, Bailey D. Initial economic analysis of aquaponic systems. In: Chopin T, Reinertsen H. (eds.). Aquaculture Europe 2003: Beyond Monoculture. Trondheim, Norway. European Aquaculture Society Spec Publ 2003; 33: 58-64.spa
dc.relation.referencesLin Y, Jing S, Lee D, Chang Y, Chen V, Shih K. Performance of a constructed wetland treating intensive shrimp aquaculture wastewater under high hydraulic loading rate. Environmental Pollution 2005; 134: 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.09.015spa
dc.relation.referencesPosadas B. Comparative economic analysis of using different sizes of constructed wetlands in recirculating catfish pond production. Journal of Applied Aquaculture 2001; 11: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1300/J028v11n03_01spa
dc.relation.referencesTroell M, Halling C, Neori A. Chopin T, Buschmann AH, Kautsky N, et al. Integrated mariculture: asking the right questions. Aquaculture 2003; 226: 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00469-1spa
dc.relation.referencesNeori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann A, Kraemer G, Halling C, et al. 2003. Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern maricultura. Aquaculture 2003; 231: 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.11.015spa
dc.relation.referencesBuschmann A, Hernández-González M, Astudillo C, De la Fuente L, Gutierrez A, Aroca G. Seaweed cultivation, product development and integrated aquaculture studies in Chile. World Aquaculture 2005; 36: 51-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesLazur A, Britt D. Pond recirculating production systems. SRAC Publication 1997; 455: 1-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesShpigel M, Neori A, Popper D, Gordin H. A proposed model for "environmentally clean" land-based culture of fish, bivalves and seaweeds. Aquaculture 1993; 117: 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(93)90128-Lspa
dc.relation.referencesChow F, Macchiavello J, Santa Cruz S, Fonck E, Olivares J. Utilization of Gracilaria chilensis (Rhodophyta: Gracilariaceae) as a biofilter in the depuration of effluents from tank cultures of fish, oysters and sea urchins. J World Aquacult Soc 2001; 32: 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2001.tb01098.xspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1041spa
dc.subjectFish cultureeng
dc.subjectaquacultureeng
dc.subjecteffluenteng
dc.subjectbiotransformationeng
dc.subjectsustainabilityeng
dc.subjectPisciculturaspa
dc.subjectacuiculturaspa
dc.subjectefluentespa
dc.subjectbiotransformaciónspa
dc.subjectsostenibilidadspa
dc.titleTratamiento de efluentes: una vía para la acuicultura responsablespa
dc.title.translatedEffluent treatment: a way to a responsible aquacultureeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Colecciones
HAJ. Revista MVZ