Publicación:
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Antonio, Hanssel Ivánspa
dc.contributor.authorVázquez-Luna, Dinoraspa
dc.contributor.authorLara-Rodríguez, Daniel Alejandrospa
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Martínez, Marinaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-02 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T21:01:38Z
dc.date.available2021-05-02 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-07-01T21:01:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-02
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeaudio/mpegspa
dc.format.mimetypeaudio/mpegspa
dc.identifier.doi10.21897/rmvz.2055
dc.identifier.eissn1909-0544
dc.identifier.issn0122-0268
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/6088
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2055
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3087
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3088
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3547
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3549
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3548
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3550
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3089
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3090
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 3 , Año 2021 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 26(3) Septiembre-Diciembre 2021spa
dc.relation.citationendpagee2055
dc.relation.citationissue3spa
dc.relation.citationstartpagee2055
dc.relation.citationvolume26spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista MVZ Córdobaspa
dc.relation.referencesHlongwane NL, Hadebe K, Soma P, Dzomba EF, Muchadeyi FC. Genome Wide Assessment of Genetic Variation and Population Distinctiveness of the Pig Family in South Africa. Front Genet. 2020; 11:344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00344spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Castañeda FE, Perea-Peña M. Estrategias locales y de gestión para la porcicultura doméstica en localidades periurbanas del Valle de México. Agric Soc Desarro. 2012; 9(4):411-425. https://www.revista-asyd.mx/index.php/asyd/article/view/1180/515spa
dc.relation.referencesTemple D, Courboulay V, Velarde A, Dalmau A, Manteca X. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems in France and Spain: assessment of health. Anim Welfare. 2012; 21(2):257-271. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.2.257spa
dc.relation.referencesMora QRA. Enfoque eficiente del bienestar animal en el contexto nacional e internacional. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 2011; 24(3):327-331. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/324691/20782035spa
dc.relation.referencesKittawornrat A, Zimmerman JJ. Toward a better understanding of pig behavior and pig welfare. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011; 12(1):25-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252310000174spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson N, Iorliam B. Minimizing Stress In Pigs In Confinements When Conducting Research-A Review. Int J Adv Res Publ. 2020; 4(3):158-160. http://www.ijarp.org/published-research-papers/mar2020/Minimizing-Stress-In-Pigs-In-Confinements-When-Conducting-Research-A-Review.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez-Ruiz E, Aranda-Cirerol F, Rodríguez-Vivas R, Bolio-González M, Ramírez-González S, Estrella-Tec J. Factores sociales de la crianza de animales de traspatio en Yucatán, México. Bioagrociencias. 2012; 5:20-28. https://www.ccba.uady.mx/bioagro/V5N1/V5N1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesBenítez-Meza A, Gómez-Gurrola A, Hernández-Ballesteros J, Navarrete-Méndez R, Moreno-Flores L. Evaluación de parámetros productivos y económicos en la alimentación de porcinos en engorda. Aban Vet. 2015; 5(3):36-41. https://abanicoacademico.mx/revistasabanico/index.php/abanico-veterinario/article/view/80/63spa
dc.relation.referencesSanvicente L, Vargas L, Bustamante G, Jaramillo V. La crianza de cerdos en vida libre y pecaríes silvestres en zonas de transición de áreas protegidas del sureste de México. Arch Zootec. 2020; 69(266):216-224. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i266.5117spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález OF, Pérez MA, Ocampo FI, Paredes SJA, de la Rosa PP. Contribuciones de la producción en traspatio a los grupos domésticos campesinos. Estud Soc. 2014; 22(44):146-170. https://www.ciad.mx/estudiosociales/index.php/es/article/view/145/92spa
dc.relation.referencesReyna-Ramírez CA, Fuentes-Ponce MH, Rossing WA, López-Ridaura S. Caracterización de unidades de producción familiar agropecuarias mesoamericanas. Agrociencia. 2020; 54(2):259-277. https://agrociencia-colpos.mx/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/1905/1902spa
dc.relation.referencesStockemer D. Conducting a Survey. In: Stockemer D, editor. Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences: A Practical Introduction with Examples in SPSS and Stata. Cham: Springer Inte Publ; 2019.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4_5spa
dc.relation.referencesCourboulay V, Meunier-Salaün M-C, Stankowiak M, Pol F. BEEP: An advisory pig welfare assessment tool developed by farmers for farmers. Lives Sci. 2020; 240:104107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104107spa
dc.relation.referencesHawe SJ, Scollan N, Gordon A, Muns R, Magowan E. Impact of feeding low and average birthweight pigs on a weight basis post-weaning on growth performance and body composition. Livest Sci. 2020;241:104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104233spa
dc.relation.referencesVerdon M, Hansen CF, Rault JL, Jongman E, Hansen LU, Plush K, et al. Effects of group housing on sow welfare: A review. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93(5):1999-2017. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8742spa
dc.relation.referencesHemsworth P. Key determinants of pig welfare: implications of animal management and housing design on livestock welfare. Anim Prod Sci. 2018; 58(8):1375-1386. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17897spa
dc.relation.referencesManteca X, Mainau D, Temple D. Bienestar animal. Manual de Buenas Prácticas de Producción Porcina Lineamientos generales para el pequeño y mediano productor de cerdos Red Porcina Iberoamericana. 2012: 97-111. http://200.23.35.7/archivos/productos/vinculacion/librosdivulgacion/300700005_1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVarón-Álvarez L, Romero M, Sánchez J. Caracterización de las contusiones cutáneas e identificación de factores de riesgo durante el manejo presacrificio de cerdos comerciales. Arch Med Vet. 2014; 46(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2014000100013spa
dc.relation.referencesVerma J. Data analysis in management with SPSS software: Springer Sci Bus Media; 2012. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9788132207856spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Contreras A, Ortega YDL, Yagüe A, González JG, Artiga CG. Alimentación práctica del cerdo. Rev Complut Cienc Vet. 2012; 6(1):21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCCV.2012.v6.n1.38718spa
dc.relation.referencesHemsworth PH, Rice M, Nash J, Giri K, Butler KL, Tilbrook AJ, et al. Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: Aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance1. J Anim Sci. 2013 2013; 91(10):4953-4964. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5807spa
dc.relation.referencesCadéro A, Aubry A, Dourmad JY, Salaün Y, Garcia-Launay F. Effects of interactions between feeding practices, animal health and farm infrastructure on technical, economic and environmental performances of a pig-fattening unit. animal. 2020: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000300spa
dc.relation.referencesVitali M, Santacroce E, Correa F, Salvarani C, Maramotti FP, Padalino B, et al. On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Suckling Piglets: A Pilot Study. Animals. 2020; 10(6):1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061016spa
dc.relation.referencesHeid A, Hamm U. Animal welfare versus food quality: Factors influencing organic consumers’ preferences for alternatives to piglet castration without anaesthesia. Meat Sci. 2013; 95(2):203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.052spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan L, Itin-Shwartz B, Koren L, Meyer JS, Matas D, Younis A, et al. Physiological and economic benefits of abandoning invasive surgical procedures and enhancing animal welfare in swine production. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):16093. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52677-6spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Beirendonck S, Driessen B, Verbeke G, Permentier L, Van de Perre V, Geers R. Improving survival, growth rate, and animal welfare in piglets by avoiding teeth shortening and tail docking. J Vet Behav. 2012; 7(2):88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.005spa
dc.relation.referencesKauppinen T, Vesala KM, Valros A. Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livest Sci. 2012; 143(2):142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcia ADM. Tipificación del maltrato animal en el Estado de Hidalgo, México: Derecho Animal Forum of Animal Law Studies; 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesVargas-Bello-Pérez E, Miranda-de la Lama GC, Teixeira DL, Enríquez-Hidalgo D, Tadich T, Lensink J. Farm Animal Welfare Influences on Markets and Consumer Attitudes in Latin America: The Cases of Mexico, Chile and Brazil. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2017; 30(5):697-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9695-2spa
dc.relation.referencesNowland TL, van Wettere WHEJ, Plush KJ. Allowing sows to farrow unconfined has positive implications for sow and piglet welfare. Applied Anim Behav Sci. 2019; 221:104872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104872spa
dc.relation.referencesYang CH, Ko HL, Salazar LC, Llonch L, Manteca X, Camerlink I, et al. Pre-weaning environmental enrichment increases piglets’ object play behaviour on a large scale commercial pig farm. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018; 202:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.004spa
dc.relation.referencesBensoussan S, Tigeot R, Meunier-Salaün M-C, Tallet C. Broadcasting human voice to piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) modifies their behavioural reaction to human presence in the home pen and in arena tests. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020; 225:104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104965spa
dc.relation.referencesde Oliveira D, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Zupan M, Rehn T, Keeling LJ. Early human handling in non-weaned piglets: Effects on behaviour and body weight. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015; 164:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesFraser D, Duncan IJH, Edwards SA, Grandin T, Gregory NG, Guyonnet V, et al. General Principles for the welfare of animals in production systems: The underlying science and its application. Vet J. 2013; 198(1):19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.028spa
dc.relation.referencesNowak B, Mucha A, Kruszyński W, Moska M. Phenotypic correlations between reproductive charac-teristics related to litter and reproductive cycle length in sows. Czech J Anim Sci. 2020; 65(6):205-212. https://doi.org/10.17221/108/2020-CJASspa
dc.relation.referencesManteca X. Bienestar animal en explotaciones de porcino. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2011; 24(3):303-305. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/324687/20782025spa
dc.rightsHanssel Iván Hernández-Antonio, Dinora Vázquez-Luna, Daniel Alejandro Lara-Rodríguez, Marina Martínez-Martínez - 2021spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2055spa
dc.subjectPigseng
dc.subjectlivestock managementeng
dc.subjectcastrationeng
dc.subjectcleaningeng
dc.subjecthumid tropicseng
dc.subjectCerdosspa
dc.subjectmanejo del ganadospa
dc.subjectcastraciónspa
dc.subjectlimpiezaspa
dc.subjecttrópico húmedospa
dc.titleCuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, Méxicospa
dc.title.translatedPractical quantification of animal welfare in pigs of small producers in southern Veracruz, Mexicoeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Colecciones
HAJ. Revista MVZ