Publicación:
Retos en el diagnóstico y control del virus de la enfermedad de Marek en Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorLopez O, Saraspa
dc.contributor.authorVillar A, Davidspa
dc.contributor.authorChaparro G, Jennyspa
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-19 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T21:01:10Z
dc.date.available2018-12-19 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-07-01T21:01:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-19
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipspa
dc.identifier.doi10.21897/rmvz.1604
dc.identifier.eissn1909-0544
dc.identifier.issn0122-0268
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/6002
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1604
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1604/1859
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1604/1860
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1604/2042
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1604/2043
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1604/2045
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1604/2046
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2019 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 24(1) Enero-abril 2019spa
dc.relation.citationendpage7165
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage7157
dc.relation.citationvolume24spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista MVZ Córdobaspa
dc.relation.referencesDufour-Zavala L. A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of Avian Pathogens. 6th Edition, Chapter 52. Jacksonville, Fl. United States: American Association of Avian Pathologists; 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesShahzad MK, Majeed KA, Younus M. Marek’ s Disease: A Mini-Review. IJAVMS. 2007; 1:4–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwayne D, JR Glisson, LR McDougald, LK Nolan, DL Suarez, VL Nair. Diseases of poultry. 13th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, inc; 2017. URL Available in: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119421481spa
dc.relation.referencesKato S, Horiuchi T, Mikami T, Hirai K. (Eds.) Advances in Marek’s Disease Research. Osaka Japanese Association on Marek’s Disease: Japon; 1988.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson F, Nair V. (Editors). Marek disease virus: An Evolving Problem. 1ed. Compton, UK: Elsevier BV; 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva RF, Cheng HH, Coussens PM, Lee LF, Velicer LF (Eds.) Current Research on Marek’s Disease Kennett Square PA. United States: American Association of Avian Pathologists; 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesCuello S, Vega A, Relova D. Enfermedad de Marek: Breve reseña bibliográfica y situación actual. Rev Electrónica Vet. 2014; 15(10):1–19. Available from: http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n101014/101405.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesGimeno IM. Marek’s disease vaccines: A solution for today but a worry for tomorrow?. Vaccine. 2008; 26(8):C31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.009spa
dc.relation.referencesNair V. Evolution of Marek’s disease - A paradigm for incessant race between the pathogen and the host. Vet J. 2005; 170:175–83.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoss N, Sullivan G, Coudert F. Influence of chicken genotype on protection against Marek’s disease by a Herpesvirus of turkeys recombinant expressing glycoprotein B (gB) of Marek’s disease virus. Vaccine. 1996; 14(3):187–189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410X(95)00215-Mspa
dc.relation.referencesBiggs PM. The history and biology of Marek’s disease virus. In: Hirai K, editor. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology,. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesFehler F. Marek’ s Disease: History, actual and future perspectives. Lohman Inf. 2001; 25:1–5. URL Available: http://lohmann-information.de/content/l_i_25_article_4.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA). RESOLUCIÓN No. 587 (Diciembre 27 de 1973) “Por la cual se dictan medidas para el control de la enfermedad de Marek en las aves de corral.” [cited 2015 Feb 25]. Colombia; 1973.spa
dc.relation.referencesGimeno IM, Fletcher OJ, Montiel E, Osuna ON, Majó RD, Smyth JA, et al. Enfermedades inmunosupresoras en avicultura. Servet E: España;. 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesWitter RL, Calnek BW, Buscaglia C, Gimeno IM, Schat KA. Classification of Marek’s disease viruses according to pathotype: philosophy and methodology. Avian Pathol. 2005; 34(2):75–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079450500059255spa
dc.relation.referencesLopez-Osorio S, Piedrahita D, Espinal-Restrepo MA, Ramirez-Nieto GC, Nair V, Williams SM, et al. Molecular characterization of Marek’ s disease virus in a poultry layer farm from Colombia. Poult Sci. 2017; 96(6): 1598–1608. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew464spa
dc.relation.referencesLopez-Osorio S, Chaparro JJ, Piedrahita D, Ramírez GC. Presencia de los Virus de la Enfermedad de Marek y Anemia Infecciosa Aviar en aves de levante del norte y oriente del departamento de Antioquia [Maestría en Ciencias Veterinarias]. Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia; 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesGong Z, Zhang L, Wang J, Chen L, Shan H, Wang Z, et al. Isolation and analysis of a very virulent Marek’s disease virus strain in China. Virol J. 2013; 10(1):155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-155spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang Z, Liu S, Ma C, Zhao P, Cui Z. Absolute quantification of a very virulent Marek’s disease virus dynamic quantity and distributions in different tissues 1. Poult Sci. 2015; 94(6):1150–7.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev063spa
dc.relation.referencesAtkins KE, Read AF, Savill NJ, Renz KG, Islam AF, Walkden-Brown SW, et al. Vaccination and reduced cohort duration can drive virulence evolution: Marek’s disease virus and industrialized agriculture. Evolution. 2013; 67:851-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01803.xspa
dc.relation.referencesSilva RF, Cheng HH,. Coussens PM,. Lee LF, Velicer LF. Current Research on Marek’s Disease. Kennett Square: American Association of Avian Pathologists; 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesShek WR, Schat KA, Calnek BW. Characterization of non-oncogenic Marek’s disease virus-infected and turkey herpesvirus infected lymphocytes. J Gen Virol. 1982; 63:333–341. https://dx.doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-63-2-333spa
dc.relation.referencesCalnek BW, Schat KA, Ross LJN, Shek WR, Chen CLH. Further characterization of Marek’s disease virus infected lymphocytes. I. In vivo infection. Int J Cancer. 1984; 33:389–398. PMID: 6321364spa
dc.relation.referencesCalnek BW, Schat KA, Ross LJN, Chen CLH. Further characterization of Marek’s disease virus infected lymphocytes. II. In vitro infection. Int J Cancer. 1984; 33:399–406. PMID: 6321365spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson I, Borenshtain R. Novel applications of feather tip extracts from MDV-infected chickens; diagnosis of commercial broilers, whole genome separation by PFGE and synchronic mucosal infection FEMS. Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003; 38:199–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00177-9spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson I, Artzi N, Shkoda I, Lublin A, Loeb E, Schat KA. The contribution of feathers in the spread of chicken anemia virus. Virus Res. 2008; 132(1–2):152–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2007.11.012spa
dc.relation.referencesHaq K, Schat KA, Sharif. S. Immunity to Marek’s disease: Where are we now?. Dev Comp Immunol. 2013; 41:439–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2013.04.001spa
dc.relation.referencesOmar AR, Schat KA. Syngeneic Marek’s disease virus (MDV)-specific cell-mediated immune responses against immediate early, late, and unique MDV proteins. Virology. 1996; 222:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1996.0400 PMID: 8806490spa
dc.relation.referencesSharma JM, Witter RL. The effect of B-cell immunosuppression on age-related resistance of chickens to Marek’s disease. Cancer Res. 1975; 35:711–717. PMID: 234791spa
dc.relation.referencesParvizi P, Abdul-Careem MF, K. Haq N, Thanthrige-Don, Schat KA. Immune responses against Marek’s disease virus. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2010; 11(2):123–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252310000022spa
dc.relation.referencesBecker Y, Asher Y, Tabor E, Davidson I, Malkinson M, Weisman Y. Polymerase chain reaction for differentiation between pathogenic and non-pathogenic serotype 1 Marek’s disease viruses (MDV) and vaccine viruses of MDV-serotypes 2 and 3. J Virol Methods. 1992; 40(3):307–22. PMID: 1335457spa
dc.relation.referencesWei X, Shi X, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Wang M, Liu C, et al. Development of a rapid and specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection method that targets Marek’s disease virus meq gene. J Virol Methods. 2012; 183(2):196–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.04.014spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson I, Borenshtain R, Weisman Y. Molecular identification of the Marek’s disease virus vaccine strain CVI988 in vaccinated chickens. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2002; 49(2):83–87. PMID: 12002424spa
dc.relation.referencesBaigent SJ, Petherbridge LJ, Howes K, Smith LP, Currie RJW, Nair VK. Absolute quantitation of Marek’s disease virus genome copy number in chicken feather and lymphocyte samples using real-time PCR. J Virol Methods. 2005; 123(1):53–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.08.019spa
dc.relation.referencesIslam A, Cheetham BF, Mahony TJ, Young PL, Walkden-Brown SW. Absolute quantitation of Marek’s disease virus and Herpesvirus of turkeys in chicken lymphocyte, feather tip and dust samples using real-time PCR. J Virol Methods. 2006; 132(1–2):127–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.10.009spa
dc.relation.referencesLevy H, Maray T, Davidson I, Malkinson M, Becker Y, Maray T, et al. Replication of Marek ’ s disease virus in chicken feather tips containing vaccinal turkey herpesvirus DNA Replication of Marek ’ s disease virus in chicken feather tips containing vaccinal turkey herpesvirus DNA. Avian Pathol. 2007; 20(1):35–44.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459108418739spa
dc.relation.referencesBaigent SJ, Smith LP, Petherbridge LJ, Nair VK. Differential quantification of cloned CVI988 vaccine strain and virulent RB-1B strain of Marek’s disease viruses in chicken tissues, using real-time PCR. Res Vet Sci. 2011; 91(1):167–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.08.002spa
dc.relation.referencesIslam T, Walkden-brown SW, Renz KG, Islam AFMF, Ralapanawe S. Replication kinetics and shedding of very virulent Marek’ s disease virus and vaccinal Rispens / CVI988 virus during single and mixed infections varying in order and interval between infections. Vet Microbiol. 2014; 173(3–4):208–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.07.027spa
dc.relation.referencesWalkden-Brown SW, Islam A, Islam A, Burgess SK, Groves PJ, Cooke J. Pathotyping of Australian isolates of Marek’s disease virus in commercial broiler chickens vaccinated with herpesvirus of turkeys (HVT) or bivalent (HVT/SB1) vaccine and association with viral load in the spleen and feather dander. Aust Vet J. 2013; 91(8):341–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avj.12084spa
dc.relation.referencesWitter RL, Calnek BW, Buscaglia C, Gimeno IM, Schat KA. Classification of Marek’s disease viruses according to pathotype: philosophy and methodology. Avian Pathol. 2005; 34:75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450500059255spa
dc.relation.referencesWitter RL. Increased Virulence of Marek’ s Disease Virus Field Isolates. Avian Dis. 1997; 41(1):149–63. PMID: 9087332spa
dc.relation.referencesDudnikova E, Norkina S, Vlasov A, Slobodchuk A, Lee LF, Witter RL. Evaluation of Marek’s disease field isolates by the “best fit” pathotyping assay. Avian Pathol; 2007; 36(2):135–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079450701209857spa
dc.relation.referencesCalnek BW, Harris RW, Buscaglia C, Schat KA, Lucio. B. Relationship between the immunosuppressive potential and the pathotype of Marek’s disease virus isolates. Avian Dis. 1998; 42(1):124–132. PMID: 9533089spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang Y, Li Z, Bao K, Lv H, Gao Y, Gao H, et al. Pathogenic characteristics of Marek’s disease virus field strains prevalent in China and the effectiveness of existing vaccines against them. Vet Microbiol. 2015; 177(1–2):62–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.12.020spa
dc.relation.referencesRenz KG, Islam A, Cheetham BF, Walkden-Brown SW. Absolute quantification using real-time polymerase chain reaction of Marek’s disease virus serotype 2 in field dust samples, feather tips and spleens. J Virol Methods. 2006; 135(2):186–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.03.017spa
dc.relation.referencesHaridy M, Goryo M, Sasaki J, Okada K. Pathological and immunohistochemical study of chickens with co-infection of Marek’s disease virus and chicken anaemia virus,. Avian Pathol. 2009; 38(6):469-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450903349162spa
dc.relation.referencesXiu-guo D, Guo Z, Zi-qiang C, Gui-hua W, Xiang-kai M, Ting-ting G, et al. Dynamic Pathology and Antigen Location Study on Broiler Breeders with Coinfection of Marek’s Disease Virus and Reticuloendotheliosis Virus. Agric Sci China. 2008; 7(11):1387–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60189-3spa
dc.relation.referencesBaigent SJ, Smith LP, Nair VK, Currie RJW. Vaccinal control of Marek’s disease: current challenges, and future strategies to maximize protection. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006; 112(1–2):78–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.03.014spa
dc.relation.referencesRalapanawe S. Field studies on the detection, persistence and spread of the Rispens CVI988 vaccine virus and the extent of co- infection with Marek ’ s disease virus. Aust Vet J. 2016; 94(9):329-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12479spa
dc.relation.referencesDavison F, Nair V. Marek´s Disease: An evolving Problem. 1st ed.. Compton, UK: Elsevier B.V.; 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez S, Piedrahita D, Ramírez GC, Aranzazu D, Williams S, Chaparro J. La inmunodepresión subclínica, un problema importante en los sistemas de producción avícola. Plumazos. 2015; (51):14–23. URL Available in: http://pubhtml5.com/fcla/ohnv/basicspa
dc.relation.referencesOsterrieder N, Kamil JP, Schumacher D, Tischer BK, Trapp S. Marek’s disease virus: from miasma to model. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006; 4:283–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1382spa
dc.relation.referencesLopera Toro PA. Evaluación epidemiológica molecular de las cepas circulantes del virus de la enfermedad de Marek en brotes presentados en Colombia durante el período de 2000 al 2012. [Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Animales]. Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia; 2017.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1604spa
dc.subjectFowl paralysis viruseng
dc.subjectgallid herpesvirus 1eng
dc.subjectherpesviruseng
dc.subjectimmunodepressioneng
dc.subjectmardiviruseng
dc.subjectGallid herpesvirus 1spa
dc.subjectherpesvirusspa
dc.subjectMardivirusspa
dc.subjectinmunodepresiónspa
dc.subjectirus paralítico de las avesspa
dc.titleRetos en el diagnóstico y control del virus de la enfermedad de Marek en Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedChallenges in the diagnosis and control of Marek’s disease virus in Colombiaeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Colecciones
HAJ. Revista MVZ