Publicación:
Framework tecnológico para mejorar la accesibilidad y seguridad del transporte universitario en instituciones públicas: una solución innovadora para jóvenes de bajos recursos

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audience
dc.contributor.advisorBaena-Navarro, Rubén
dc.contributor.advisorSalas Alvarez, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Díaz, Dana Karina
dc.contributor.authorSalazar Restán, Marolyn Andrea
dc.contributor.juryCrawford Vidal, Richard Adolfo
dc.contributor.juryBarreiro Pinto, Francisco Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-06T13:00:42Z
dc.date.available2024-12-06T13:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-05
dc.description.abstractLa accesibilidad y seguridad en el transporte son elementos críticos para promover la inclusión en las universidades públicas, particularmente entre estudiantes de bajos ingresos que enfrentan barreras significativas en su movilidad diaria. Este estudio se enfoca en el diseño de un framework tecnológico conceptual destinado a mejorar el acceso al transporte seguro y accesible para estudiantes universitarios, alineado con sus horarios y necesidades específicas. La metodología proyectiva fue aplicada en el desarrollo teórico del framework, incorporando análisis de casos de uso y revisión de literatura para identificar los principales desafíos en la accesibilidad y seguridad del transporte universitario. La evaluación preliminar del framework se realiza mediante pruebas manuales en entornos simulados, lo cual permite una validación inicial de sus funcionalidades en un contexto controlado. Los resultados sugieren que la integración de una plataforma adaptable, basada en la gestión de rutas y reservas, optimiza la movilidad estudiantil y contribuye a reducir las barreras de acceso a la educación. Además, el sistema propuesto prioriza la usabilidad, seguridad de datos y escalabilidad, aspectos fundamentales para su futura implementación en entornos universitarios. Este trabajo plantea que la adopción de este framework no solo facilita el acceso educativo, sino que también apoya la sostenibilidad y el bienestar de los estudiantes, generando un modelo aplicable en diversas instituciones públicas.spa
dc.description.abstractAccessibility and safety in transportation are critical elements for promoting inclusion in public universities, particularly among low-income students who face significant mobility barriers in their daily commute. This study focuses on designing a conceptual technological framework aimed at improving access to safe and affordable transportation for university students, aligned with their schedules and specific needs. A projective methodology was applied in the theoretical development of the framework, incorporating use case analysis and a literature review to identify the main challenges in university transportation accessibility and safety. The preliminary evaluation of the framework is carried out through manual testing in simulated environments, allowing an initial validation of its functionalities in a controlled context. Results suggest that integrating an adaptable platform based on route and reservation management optimizes student mobility and helps reduce barriers to education. Additionally, the proposed system prioritizes usability, data security, and scalability, essential aspects for future implementation in university settings. This study suggests that adopting this framework not only facilitates educational access but also supports the sustainability and well-being of students, creating a model applicable in various public institutions.eng
dc.description.degreelevelPregrado
dc.description.degreenameIngeniero(a) de Sistemas
dc.description.modalityMonografías
dc.description.tableofcontentsRESUMEN 10spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsABSTRACT 11spa
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCCIÓN 12spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2. DESARROLLO DEL TEMA 17spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.1 JUSTIFICACIÓN 17spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2 OBJETIVOS 20spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2.1 Objetivo general 20spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.2.2 Objetivos específicos 20spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3 MARCO TEÓRICO 21spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3.1 Accesibilidad al Transporte en el Contexto Universitario 21spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3.2 Frameworks Tecnológicos en la Movilidad Universitaria 21spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3.3 Sostenibilidad y Bienestar Estudiantil 22spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3.4. Frameworks de Políticas Inclusivas y Equidad Educativa 22spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3.5. Reducción de Desigualdades Socioeconómicas a través de Frameworks 23spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3.6. Impacto Social y Académico de la Accesibilidad Estructurada en un Framework 23spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.3.7. Frameworks para la Inclusión Social en el Transporte Universitario 24spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4 REVISIÓN DE LA LITERATURA 25spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.1 Proceso PRISMA de Revisión de Literatura 25spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.2 Estrategia de Búsqueda 25spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.3 Criterios de Inclusión y Exclusión 26spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.4 Selección de Estudios 26spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.4.5 Evaluación de Calidad y Síntesis 27spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.5 CONCEPTOS CLAVES Y TEORÍAS RELACIONADAS CON EL TEMA 31spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsAccesibilidad en el Transporte Universitario 31spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsSostenibilidad en el Transporte Universitario 31spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsFrameworks Tecnológicos para Movilidad 32spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsExternalidades Positivas del Transporte Sostenible 32spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsInfluencia Socioeconómica en la Elección de Transporte 32spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsSeguridad en la Infraestructura de Transporte 32spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsPruebas Manuales en Entornos Controlados para la Evaluación de Frameworks Tecnológicos 33spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.6 METODOLOGÍA 34spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsEtapa 1: Diagnóstico Basado en Revisión de Literatura 34spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsEtapa 2: Diseño del Framework Tecnológico 35spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsEtapa 3: Evaluación de Viabilidad mediante Pruebas Manuales en Escenarios Controlados 36spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsEtapa 4: Desarrollo de Directrices para la Implementación 36spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.7 PROCEDIMIENTO DE ANÁLISIS 37spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.7.1. Análisis de Revisión de Literatura 37spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.7.2. Validación de Requisitos del Framework 38spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.7.3. Pruebas Manuales de Funcionamiento y Rendimiento 38spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.7.4. Evaluación y Ajuste de Directrices para la Implementación 39spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.8 POBLACIÓN Y MUESTRA 40spa
dc.description.tableofcontents2.9 DESARROLLO 42spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsRESULTADOS DEL ANÁLISIS/DISCUSIÓN DEL TEMA 42spa
dc.description.tableofcontents3. CONCLUSIONES 72spa
dc.description.tableofcontents4. BIBLIOGRAFÍA 74spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsANEXOS 79spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de Córdoba
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Unicórdoba
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/8787
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad De Córdoba
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.placeMontería, Córdoba, Colombia
dc.publisher.programIngeniería de Sistemas
dc.relation.referencesAl Jabor, A. N., Adnan, F., Park, M., & Othman, A. (2021). Mada Web Accessibility Monitor Tool. IEEE ICTA, 9809423. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTA54582.2021.9809423
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, C., da Silva Bispo, E., Santos Fernandes, J., Gois Santana, K. M., Lima Gomes, T. G., Santos, H., & da Silva Amorim, L. L. (2018). Acesso a transporte coletivo e direito à educação superior: Situação de estudantes que residem no interior de Sergipe e frequentam o curso de Direito da Faculdade Pio Décimo em Aracaju. Revista Eletrônica Saber Digital e Educação Superior, 3(5), 57. https://doi.org/10.29282/ESDM.V3I5.57
dc.relation.referencesAnis, S., Di Febbraro, A., & Sacco, N. (2021). A Methodological Framework for Determination of Public Transport Accessibility Index. IEEE SCSP. DOI: 10.1109/SCSP52043.2021.9447403
dc.relation.referencesBaena-Navarro, R., Vergara-Villadiego, J., Carriazo-Regino, Y., Crawford-Vidal, R., & Barreiro-Pinto, F. (2024). Challenges in implementing free software in small and medium-sized enterprises in the city of Montería: a case study. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 13(1), 586–597. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i1.6710
dc.relation.referencesBaig, M. H., Waheed, A., Rana, I., & Abbas, K. (2021). Determinants of transportation sustainability in universities of Islamabad, Pakistan. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(7), 1129-1144. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-07-2020-0273
dc.relation.referencesBeecroft, M., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Nelson, J., & Niewiadomski, P. (2019). From infrastructure to digital networks: accessibility and connectivity in transport geography research at Aberdeen. Transport Geography Review, 147(4), 69-81. DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2019.1695906
dc.relation.referencesBennett, D., & Miller, S. (2000). Electronic Educational Data Security: System Analysis and Teacher Training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(3), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.2190/7M9U-3648-4JJB-QG64
dc.relation.referencesCanale, A., Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Sanfilippo, L., & Brignone, A. (2020). The Evaluation of Home-School Itineraries to Improve Accessibility of a University Campus Through Sustainable Transport Modes. Springer International Publishing, 58802. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58802-1_54
dc.relation.referencesCao, S., & Loiacono-Mello, E. T. (2021). Perceptions of web accessibility guidelines by student website and app developers. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(8), 754-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1940278
dc.relation.referencesCattaneo, M., Malighetti, P., Morlotti, C., & Paleari, S. (2018). Students’ mobility attitudes and sustainable transport mode choice. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(4), 000-000. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2017-0134
dc.relation.referencesChristensen, L. L., Shyyan, V. V., & Macmillan, F. (2023). Toward a systematic accessibility review process for English language proficiency tests for young learners. Language Testing, 31168386. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231168386
dc.relation.referencesClay, J., & Valentine, J. L. (2021). Impact of Transportation Supports on Students’ Academic Outcomes: A Quasi-Experimental Study of the U-Pass at Rio Hondo College. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 000-000. https://doi.org/10.34944/DSPACE/6932
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de Colombia. (2021). Ley 2161 de 2021.
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de Colombia. (2022). Ley 2251 de 2022.
dc.relation.referencesCyril, A., Mulangi, R. H., & George, V. (2019). Development of a GIS-Based Composite Public Transport Accessibility Index. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 13(2), 235-245. DOI: 10.4090/juee.2019.v13n2.235245
dc.relation.referencesDe Alba-Martínez, H., Grindlay, A., & Ochoa-Covarrubias, G. (2020). (In)Equitable Accessibility to Sustainable Transport from Universities in the Guadalajara Metropolitan Area, Mexico. Sustainability, 13(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010055
dc.relation.referencesDvir, M., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2021). The double-edged sword of conjecturing. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(7), 915-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1940427
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Reynel, J. L., Baena Navarro, R. E., & Yepes Miranda, D. D. (2023). Modelo de desarrollo basado en métricas de usabilidad para la construcción de aplicaciones móviles educativas. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 31, 0-0.
dc.relation.referencesFathauer, L., & Rao, D. (2019). Accessibility in an educational software system: Experiences and Design Tips. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 9028402. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028402
dc.relation.referencesFriman, M., Lättman, K., & Olsson, L. (2020). Public transport quality, safety, and perceived accessibility. Sustainability, 12(9), 3563. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093563
dc.relation.referencesGorbunov, A., Isaev, E., & Morgunov, A. (2017). A simulation model for educational process planning in an institution of higher education. Business Informatics, 11(2), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2017.2.57.67
dc.relation.referencesGrengs, J. (2019). On the Way But Not There Yet: Making Accessibility the Core of Equity Planning in Transportation. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501730399-009
dc.relation.referencesHaxwell, W. (2021). Sustainable Transport System at the Federal University of Amazonas. International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 9(1), 2874. https://doi.org/10.31686/IJIER.VOL9.ISS1.2874
dc.relation.referencesHelling, K., & Bölsche, D. (2023). Pathways to Sustainable Mobility at Universities - a Case Study at the Environmental Campus Birkenfeld. Journal of Sustainable Practices, 25(3), 20784. https://doi.org/10.14710/jsp.2023.20784
dc.relation.referencesHurtado, J. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación Holística Guía para la compresión holística de la ciencia. Quirón Editores, SA Cuarta Edicion.
dc.relation.referencesJamei, E., Chan, M., Chau, H., Gaisie, E., & Lättman, K. (2022). Perceived accessibility and key influencing factors in transportation. Sustainability, 14(17), 10806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710806
dc.relation.referencesKang, J., Chan, A. D. C., Trudel, C. M. J., Vukovic, B., & Girouard, A. (2021). Diversifying Accessibility Education: Presenting and Evaluating an Interdisciplinary Accessibility Training Program. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3490021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488042.3490021
dc.relation.referencesLiu, C., Bardaka, E., & Paschalidis, E. (2022). Sustainable transport choices in public transit access: Travel behavior differences between university students and other young adults. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 25(1), 209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2084656
dc.relation.referencesMarcaccio, A. C., Clarke, S., & Wetheral, A. (2022). Learning About Real Experiences From Real Users: A Blueprint for Participatory Accessibility Testing. The Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 17(1), 6658. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v17i1.6658
dc.relation.referencesMartín-Molina, V., González-Regaña, A. J., Toscano, R., & Gavilán-Izquierdo, J. M. (2020). Differences between how undergraduate students define geometric solids and what their lecturers expect from them through the lens of the theory of commognition. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), em1880. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9159
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy, K., Bragg, N., & Gentle-Genitty, C. (2022). Master social work students’ explicit and implicit articulation of theory. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2022.2074184
dc.relation.referencesMcKenna, K., & Altringer, L. (2020). Alternative transportation education: Implementing an innovative module. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(7), 65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2020-0080
dc.relation.referencesNelson, Q., Steffensmeier, D., & Pawaskar, S. (2018). A Simple Approach for Sustainable Transportation Systems in Smart Cities: A Graph Theory Model. IEEE Sustainability, 15(11), 231-238. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SUSTECH.2018.8671384
dc.relation.referencesOlsson, L., Friman, M., & Lättman, K. (2021). Accessibility Barriers and Perceived Accessibility: Implications for Public Transport. Urban Science, 5(3), 63. DOI: 10.3390/urbansci5030063
dc.relation.referencesParadowska, M. (2019). Rivalry, excludability and positive transport externalities – case study of a private university in Poland. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(1), 000-000. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0187
dc.relation.referencesPetruneva, R. (2021). Transport Accessibility of University in a Large City: Students’ Opinions. Alma Mater Journal, 8(21), 099. https://doi.org/10.20339/am.08-21.099
dc.relation.referencesPinedo-López, J., Baena-Navarro, R., Durán-Rojas, N., Díaz-Cogollo, L., & Farak-Flórez, L. (2024). Energy Transition in Colombia: An Implementation Proposal for SMEs. Sustainability, 16(17), 7263. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177263
dc.relation.referencesPotuzak, T., Lipka, R., Snajberk, J., & Brada, P. (2011). Design of a Component-Based Simulation Framework for Component Testing Using SpringDM. European Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS-EERC.2011.41
dc.relation.referencesRavikumar, G., Hyder, B., & Govindarasu, M. (2020). Efficient Modeling of IEC-61850 Logical Nodes in IEDs for Scalability in CPS Security Testbed. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 35(4), 1925-1934. https://doi.org/10.1109/TD39804.2020.9299665
dc.relation.referencesRibeiro, P. J. G., & Fonseca, F. (2022). Students’ home-university commuting patterns: A shift towards more sustainable modes of transport. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(1), 009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.03.009
dc.relation.referencesRibeiro, P. J. G., Fonseca, F., & Meireles, T. (2020). Sustainable mobility patterns to university campuses: Evaluation and constraints. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(2), 005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.02.005
dc.relation.referencesRoss, S., Ross, A. S., Abrahamson, K., & Wyant, J. (2023). Practical Physical Educator Tools for Evaluating and Using App Accessibility Features. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2146609. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2022.2146609
dc.relation.referencesToval, A., & Flores, M. (1987). Computer systems simulation in education: description of an experience. Computers & Education, 11(4), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(87)90031-5
dc.relation.referencesVidal-Durango, J., Baena-Navarro, R., & Therán-Nieto, K. (2024). Implementation and feasibility of green hydrogen in Colombian kitchens: an analysis of innovation and sustainability. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 34(2), 726. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v34.i2.pp726-744
dc.relation.referencesWang, H., Kwan, M., & Hu, M. (2020). Social exclusion and accessibility among low- and non-low-income groups: A case study of Nanjing, China. Cities, 101, 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102684
dc.relation.referencesWei, W., & Xitao, L. (2008). The Model Design of Educational Administration Safety--Based on Intrusion Detection Technology. Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Information Science and Engineering (ISISE), 1, 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBIM.2008.204
dc.relation.referencesWang, G., & Pavalkis, S. (2019). A Model-Based V&V Test Strategy Based on Emerging System Modeling Techniques. Systems Engineering, 22(4), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21493
dc.relation.referencesWittowsky, D., van der Vlugt, A.-L., & Nadler, R. (2019). Editorial – accessibility: Its role in the sustainable transformation of cities. Urban and Regional Development, 160-174. DOI: 10.1080/23800127.2019.1609389
dc.rightsCopyright Universidad de Córdoba, 2024
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordsAccessibility
dc.subject.keywordsUniversity transportation
dc.subject.keywordsTechnological framework
dc.subject.keywordsStudent mobility
dc.subject.keywordsTransportation safety
dc.subject.keywordsEducational inclusion
dc.subject.keywordsSustainability
dc.subject.proposalAccesibilidad
dc.subject.proposalTransporte universitario
dc.subject.proposalFramework tecnológico
dc.subject.proposalMovilidad estudiantil
dc.subject.proposalSeguridad en el transporte
dc.subject.proposalInclusión educativa
dc.subject.proposalSostenibilidad
dc.titleFramework tecnológico para mejorar la accesibilidad y seguridad del transporte universitario en instituciones públicas: una solución innovadora para jóvenes de bajos recursosspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregrado
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
Dana Karina González Díaz Marolyn Andrea Salazar Restán
Tamaño:
2.71 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
content.pdf
Tamaño:
296.5 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
15.18 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
F.E.B. Monografías