Publicación:
Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorE. Bennemann, Paulospa
dc.contributor.authorA. Machado, Sergiospa
dc.contributor.authorK. Girardini, Lilianspa
dc.contributor.authorSonálio, Karinaspa
dc.contributor.authorA. Tonin, Alexandrespa
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T21:00:54Z
dc.date.available2018-05-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-07-01T21:00:54Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/epub+zipspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xmlspa
dc.identifier.doi10.21897/rmvz.1338
dc.identifier.eissn1909-0544
dc.identifier.issn0122-0268
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/5943
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1338
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/pdf
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/epub
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/html
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/2493
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2018 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 23(2) Mayo-Agosto 2018spa
dc.relation.citationendpage6648
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage6637
dc.relation.citationvolume23spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista MVZ Córdobaspa
dc.relation.referencesBortolozzo FP, Menegat MB, Mellagi APG, Bernardi ML, Wentz I. New artificial insemination technologies for swine. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl. 2):80-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesRiesenbeck A. Review on international trade with boar semen. Rep Domestic Anim. 2011; 46(Suppl. 2):1-3.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorrell JM. Antimicrobials in boar semen extenders – A risk / Benefits analysis. J Antimicrob. 2016; 2(1):107-108.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlthouse GC. Sanitary Procedures for the Production of Extended Semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.xspa
dc.relation.referencesAlthouse GC, Pierdon MS, Lu KG. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenol. 2008; 70:1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.010spa
dc.relation.referencesBussalleu E, Yeste M, Sepúlveda L, Torner E, Pinart E, et al. Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011; 127: 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.07.018spa
dc.relation.referencesSchultze M, Ammon C, Rudiger K, Jung M, Grobbel M. Analysis of hygienic critical points in boar semen production. Theriogenology. 2015; 83:430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004spa
dc.relation.referencesSchulze M, Grobbel M, Muller KM, Junkes C, Dathe M, Rudiger KR, Jung M. Challenges and limits using antimicrobial peptides in boar semen preservation. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl 2):5-10.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrossfeld R, Peralta W, Weitze K, Waberski D. Antibiotic-free hypothermic storage of boar semen in Androstar +5 extender results in similar fertility results compared to semen stored at 17°C in extender with antibiotic content. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016; 169:125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.071spa
dc.relation.referencesSchulze M, Ammon C, Rüdiger K, Kung M, Grobblel M. Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production. Theriogenol. 2015; 83(3):430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004spa
dc.relation.referencesGaczarzewicz D, Udala J, Piasecka M, Blaszczyk B, Stankiewicz T. Bacterial contamination of boar semen and its relationship to sperm quality preserved in commercial extender containing gentamicin sulfate. Polish J Vet Sci. 2016; 19(3):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0057spa
dc.relation.referencesMarkey B, Leonard F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, 2013; 2 ed. MOSBY Elsevier, p. 27-49; 920 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesCLSI. Developtment of In Vitro Susceptibility Testing Criteria and Quality Control Parameters. 5th Ed. CLSI guideline 23. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlthouse GC. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.xspa
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez AL, Soom AV, Arsenakis I, Maes D. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Management. 2017; 3:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5spa
dc.relation.referencesPayne BJ, Clark S, Maddox C, Ness A. Achromobacter xylosoxidans in extended semen causes reproductive failure in artificially inseminated sows and gilts. J Swine Health Prod. 2008; 16(6):316-322.spa
dc.relation.referencesGary E Ritchie. Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes USP 24/NF. 2000; 30(5):1744. URL available in: http://www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_c1231.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesBresciani C, Cabassi CS, Morini G, Taddei S, Bigliardi E, Di Lanni F, Sabboni A, Parmigiani E. Boar semen bacterial contamination in Italy and antibiotic efficacy in a modified extender. Ital J Anim Sci. 2014; 13:3082. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3082spa
dc.relation.referencesTremblay YDN, Hathroubi S, Jacques M. Les biofilms bactériens: leur importance en santé animale et en santé publique. Canadian J Vet Res. 2014; 78(2): 110-116.spa
dc.relation.referencesFuster-Valls N, Hernández-Herrero M, Marín-de-Mateo M, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ. Effect of different environmental conditions on the bacteria survival on stainless steel surfaces. Food Cont. 2008; 19:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.04.013spa
dc.relation.referencesRode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A, Moretro T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 116:372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Souza EL, Meira QG, Barbosa IM, Athayde AJAA, Conceição ML, Siqueira-Junior JP. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus from food contact surfaces in a meat-based broth and sensitivity to sanitizers. Braz J Microbiol. 2014; 45(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822014000100010spa
dc.relation.referencesÚbeda JL, Ausejo R, Dahmani Y, Falceto MV, Usan A, Malo C, Perez-Martinez FC. Adverse effects of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family on boar sperm quality. Theriogenol. 2013; 80:565-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.022spa
dc.relation.referencesMazurova J, Kukla R, Rozkot M, Lustykova A, Slehova E, Sleha R, Lipensky J, Opletal L. Use of natural substances for boar semen decontamination. Vet Med. 2015; 60:235–247. https://doi.org/10.17221/8175-VETMEDspa
dc.relation.referencesKorpimäki T, Kurittu J, Karp M. Surprisingly fast disappearance of β-lactam selection pressure in cultivation as detected with novel biosensing approaches. J Microbiol Met. 2003; 53(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00213-0spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldberg AMG, Argenti LE, Faccin JE, Linck L, Santi M, Bernardi ML, Cardoso, MRI; Wentz, I; Bortolozzo, FP. Risk factors for bacterial contamination during boar semen collection. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 95:362–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.06.022spa
dc.relation.referencesClinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; TwentyFourty Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, PA, USA; 2014.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338spa
dc.subjectBoar semeneng
dc.subjectbacterial contaminationeng
dc.subjectantimicrobial susceptibilityeng
dc.subjectSemen porcinospa
dc.subjectcontaminación bacterianaspa
dc.subjectSusceptibilidad antimicrobianaspa
dc.titleContaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasilspa
dc.title.translatedBacterial Contaminants and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Boar Semen in Southern Brazil Studseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Colecciones
HAJ. Revista MVZ