Publicación:
Sistemas de producción de pequeños rumiantes en México y su efecto en la sostenibilidad productiva

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorChávez-Espinoza, Miguelspa
dc.contributor.authorCantú-Silva, Israelspa
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Rodríguez, Humbertospa
dc.contributor.authorMontañez-Valdez, Oziel Dantespa
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T21:01:48Z
dc.date.available2021-11-30 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-07-01T21:01:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-30
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/xmlspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/xmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeaudio/mpegspa
dc.format.mimetypeaudio/mpegspa
dc.format.mimetypespa
dc.identifier.doi10.21897/rmvz.2246
dc.identifier.eissn1909-0544
dc.identifier.issn0122-0268
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/6122
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2246
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3640
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3641
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3767
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3769
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3768
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3770
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3642
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3643
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2246/3644
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2022 : Revista MVZ Córdoba; 27(1) Enero-abril 2022spa
dc.relation.citationendpagee2246
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpagee2246
dc.relation.citationvolume27spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista MVZ Córdobaspa
dc.relation.referencesHaenlein GFW. Past, present, and future perspectives of small ruminant dairy research. J Dairy Sci. 2001; 84(9):2097–2115. https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74655-3spa
dc.relation.referencesPulina G, Milán MJ, Lavín MP, Theodoridis A, Morin E, Capote J, et al. Invited review: Current production trends, farm structures, and economics of the dairy sheep and goat sectors. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101(8):6715–6729. https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14015spa
dc.relation.referencesMarino R, Atzori AS, D’Andrea M, Iovane G, Trabalza-Marinucci M, Rinaldi L. Climate change: Production performance, health issues, greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies in sheep and goat farming. Small Rumin Res. 2016; 135:50–59. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.12.012spa
dc.relation.referencesAréchiga F, Aguilera JI, Rincón RM, Méndez de Lara S, Bañuelos VR, Meza-Herrera CA. Situación actual y perspectivas de la producción caprina ante el reto de la globalización. Trop Subtrop Agroecosys. 2008; 9(1):1–14. https://www.ccba.uady.mx/publicaciones/journal/vol-9-amca/Arechiga1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Sánchez CC, Jaramillo-Villanueva JL, Bustamante-González Á, Vargas-López S, Delgado-Alvarado A, Hernández-Mendo O, et al. Evaluation of the profitability and competitiveness of sheep production systems in the region of Libres, Puebla. Rev Mex de Cienc Pecu. 2018; 9(2):263–277. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v9i2.4495spa
dc.relation.referencesHerrera-Haro JG, Alvarez G, Bárcena-Gama R, Núñez-Aramburu JM. Caracterización de los rebaños ovinos en el sur de Ciudad de México, México. Acta Universitaria. 2019; 29:1–15. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2019.2022spa
dc.relation.referencesGallina S, Mandujano S, Villarreal-Espino-Barros OA. Monitoreo y manejo del venado cola blanca: Conceptos y métodos. Instituto de Ecología: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla: México; 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Soto JH, Badii MH. Depredación en crías de venado cola blanca (Odocoileus virginianus texanus) por coyote (Canis latrans) en una unidad de manejo y aprovechamiento del norte de Nuevo León, México. Acta Zool Mex. 2000; (81):135–138. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2000.81811877spa
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro ALG, Faro AMC da F, Peres MTP, Batista R, Poli CHEC, Villalba JJ. The role of small ruminants on global climate change. Acta Sci Anim Sci. 2018; 40:1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v40i1.43124spa
dc.relation.referencesVillarruel-Sahagúna L, Troyo-Diéguez E, Gutiérrez-Ruacho OG, Nieto-Garibay A, Esqueda M, Ffolliot P, et al. Valoración hidro-ambiental y evaluación de coeficientes de agostadero mediante indicadores termo-pluviométricos. Rev Mex de Cienc Pecu. 2014; 5(2):143–156. https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/3221/3088spa
dc.relation.referencesEl Aich A, Waterhouse A. Small ruminants in environmental conservation. Small Rumin Res. 1999; 34(3):271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00079-6spa
dc.relation.referencesZervas G, Tsiplakou E. An assessment of GHG emissions from small ruminants in comparison with GHG emissions from large ruminants and monogastric livestock. Atmos Environ. 2012; 49:13–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.039spa
dc.relation.referencesHerrera PZ, Bermejo JVD, Henríquez AA, Vallejo MEC, Costa RG. Effects of extensive system versus semi-intensive and intensive systems on growth and carcass quality of dairy kids. R Bras Zootec. 2011; 40(11):2613–2620. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100045spa
dc.relation.referencesEchavarría-Chairez FG, Gutiérrez-Luna R, Ledesma-Rivera RI, Bańuelos-Valenzuel R, Aguilera-Soto JI, Serna-Pérez A. Influencia del sistema de pastoreo con pequeños rumiantes en un agostadero del semiárido Zacatecano. I Vegetación nativa. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu. 2006; 44(2):203–217.spa
dc.relation.referencesAzuara-Morales I, López-Ortiz S, Jarillo-Rodríguez J, Pérez-Hernández P, Ortega-Jiménez E, Castillo-Gallegos E. Forage availability in a silvopastoral system having different densities of Leucaena leucocephala under Voisin grazing management. Agroforest Syst. 2020; 94:1701–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00487-5spa
dc.relation.referencesPent GJ, Fike JH. Lamb productivity on stockpiled fescue in honeylocust and black walnut silvopastures. Agroforest Syst. 2019; 93(1):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0264-0spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez-Torres J. Caracterización de un método de crianza intensiva de cervatillos (Odocoileus virginianus texanus). Rev. Chapingo ser. 2011; 10(2):141–145.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiderkorn V, Martin C, Rochette Y, Julien S, Baumont R. Associative effects between orchardgrass and red clover silages on voluntary intake and digestion in sheep: Evidence of a synergy on digestible dry matter intake. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93(10):4967–4976. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9178spa
dc.relation.referencesBonilla-Cárdenas JA, Lemus-Flores C. Emisión de metano entérico por rumiantes y su contribución al calentamiento global y al cambio climático. Revisión. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu. 2012; 3(2):215–246. https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/1241/1236spa
dc.relation.referencesGallo CS, Tadich TG. Perspective from Latin America. In: Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare. Science and Practice: Elsevier Ltd; 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101215-4.00011-0spa
dc.relation.referencesMontossi F, Font-i-Furnols M, del Campo M, San Julián R, Brito G, Sañudo C. Sustainable sheep production and consumer preference trends: Compatibilities, contradictions, and unresolved dilemmas. Meat Sci. 2013; 95(4):772–789. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.048spa
dc.relation.referencesYusuf A, Aruwayo A, Muhammad I. Characterisation of Small Ruminant Production Systems in Semi-Arid Urban Areas of Northern Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 2018; 22(5):725–729. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v22i5.18spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández M., Castillo-Juárez H., González-Montaña J. R., Fernández F. J., Castañeda Vázquez H., Saltijeral-Oaxaca J. A. Somatic cell counts and quality of goat milk produced in the central region of Mexico. Res J Dairy Sci. 2008; 2(2):45–50. https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=rjdsci.2008.45.50spa
dc.relation.referencesPeacock C, Sherman DM. Sustainable goat production-Some global perspectives. Small Rumin Res. 2010; 89(2–3):70–80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.029spa
dc.relation.referencesRúa B C, Rosero N R, Posada O S. Efecto del sistema de producción sobre producción de leche y consumo de alimento en cabras. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2017; 22(3):6266–6275. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1131spa
dc.relation.referencesEstell RE, Havstad KM, Cibils AF, Fredrickson EL, Anderson DM, Schrader TS, et al. Increasing shrub use by livestock in a world with less grass. Rangel Ecol Manag. 2012; 65(6):553–562. https://dx.doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00124.1spa
dc.relation.referencesRetana-Guiascón ÓG, Lorenzo C. Valor cinegético y cultural del venado Cola Blanca en México. Etnobiología. 2016; 14(3):60–70. https://revistaetnobiologia.mx/index.php/etno/article/view/147spa
dc.relation.referencesAssouma MH, Lecomte P, Hiernaux P, Ickowicz A, Corniaux C, Decruyenaere V, et al. How to better account for livestock diversity and fodder seasonality in assessing the fodder intake of livestock grazing semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa rangelands. Livest Sci. 2018; 216:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.07.002spa
dc.relation.referencesLeahy SC, Kearney L, Reisinger A, Clark H. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from New Zealand pasture-based livestock farm systems. J NZ Grassl. 2019; 81:101–110. https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2019.81.417spa
dc.relation.referencesForoughbakhch R, Hernández-Piñero JL, Carrillo-Parra A, Rocha-Estrada A. Composition and animal preference for plants used for goat feeding in semiarid Northeastern Mexico. J Anim Plant Sci. 2013; 23(4):1034–1040. https://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-23-4/14.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesChávez-Espinoza M, González-Rodríguez H, Cantú-Silva I, Cotera-Correa M, Estrada-Castillón AE, Bernal-Barragán H, et al. Foliar mineral content of five shrub species with nutritional potential for small ruminants in semiarid regions in northeastern Mexico. Ciênc Rural. 2020; 50(10):1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200202spa
dc.relation.referencesChávez-Espinoza M, Bernal-Barragán H, Vásquez-Aguilar NC, Cantú-Silva I, Cotera-Correa M, Estrada-Castillón AE, et al. Cell-wall composition and digestibility of five native shrubs of the Tamaulipan Thornscrub in Northeastern Mexico. Trop Subtrop Agroecosys. 2021; 24(1):15. https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/view/3447/1506spa
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero M, Cerrillo-Soto MA, Ramírez RG, Salem AZM, González H, Juárez-Reyes AS. Influence of polyethylene glycol on in vitro gas production profiles and microbial protein synthesis of some shrub species. Anim Feed Sci Technology . 2012; 176(1–4):32–39. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.005spa
dc.relation.referencesCamacho LM, Rojo R, Salem AZM, Mendoza GD, López D, Tinoco JL, et al. In vitro ruminal fermentation kinetics and energy utilization of three Mexican tree fodder species during the rainy and dry period. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2010; 160(3–4):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.008spa
dc.relation.referencesBelachew Z, Yisehak K, Taye T, Janssens GPJ. Chemical composition and in sacco ruminal degradation of tropical trees rich in condensed tannins. Czech J Anim Sci. 2013; 58(4):176–192. https://doi.org/10.17221/6712-CJASspa
dc.relation.referencesPal K, Patra AK, Sahoo A, Kumawat PK. Evaluation of several tropical tree leaves for methane production potential, degradability and rumen fermentation in vitro. Livest Sci. 2015; 180:98–105. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.07.011spa
dc.relation.referencesGaviria X, Rivera JE, Barahona R. Calidad nutricional y fraccionamiento de carbohidratos y proteína en los componentes forrajeros de un sistema silvopastoril intensivo. Pastos y Forrajes. 2015; 38(2):194–201. https://payfo.ihatuey.cu/index.php?journal=pasto&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=1838spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina IC, Donney's G, Montoya S, Rivera JE, Villegas G, Chará J, et al. The inclusion of Leucaena leucocephala reduces the methane production in lucerne heifers receiving a Cynodon plectostachyus and Megathyrsus maximus diet. Livest Res Rural Develop. 2015; 27(5):1–8. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/5/moli27096.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesAugustine DJ, Derner JD, Fernández-Giménez ME, Porensky LM, Wilmer H, Briske DD. Adaptive, Multipaddock Rotational Grazing Management: A Ranch-Scale Assessment of Effects on Vegetation and Livestock Performance in Semiarid Rangeland. Rangeland Ecol Manag. 2020; 73(6):796–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.07.005spa
dc.relation.referencesNahed-Toral J, Valdivieso-Pérez A, Aguilar-Jiménez R, Cámara-Cordova J, Grande-Cano D. Silvopastoral systems with traditional management in southeastern Mexico: A prototype of livestock agroforestry for cleaner production. J Clean Prod. 2013; 57:266–279. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.020spa
dc.relation.referencesde Oliveira BR, Carvalho-Ribeiro SM, Maia-Barbosa PM. Rio Doce State Park buffer zone: forest fragmentation and land use dynamics. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021; 23, 8365–8376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00969-7spa
dc.relation.referencesMcDermott JJ, Staal SJ, Freeman HA, Herrero M, Van de Steeg JA. Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livest Sci. 2010; 130(1–3):95–109. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.014spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKeon GM, Stone GS, Syktus JI, Carter JO, Flood NR, Ahrens DG, et al. Climate change impacts on northern Australian rangeland livestock carrying capacity: A review of issues. Rangel J. 2009; 31(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ08068spa
dc.relation.referencesEbrahimi A, Milotić T, Hoffmann M. A herbivore specific grazing capacity model accounting for spatio-temporal environmental variation: A tool for a more sustainable nature conservation and rangeland management. Ecol Model. 2010; 221(6):900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.12.009spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnston P, Tannock P, Beale I. Objective `Safe’ Grazing Capacities for South-West Queensland Australia: Model Application and Evaluation. Rangel J. 1996; 18(2):259–269. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ9960259spa
dc.relation.referencesHolechek JL, Pieper RD. Herbel CH. Range management: principles and practices. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey USA; 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Mirazo J, Robles AB. Impact of targeted sheep grazing on herbage and holm oak saplings in a silvopastoral wildfire prevention system in south-eastern Spain. Agroforest Syst. 2012; 86:477–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9510-z86(3):477–91spa
dc.relation.referencesStore R, Jokimäki J. A GIS-based multi-scale approach to habitat suitability modeling. Ecol Model. 2003; 169(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00203-5spa
dc.relation.referencesBernués A, Ruiz R, Olaizola A, Villalba D, Casasús I. Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: Synergies and trade-offs. Livest Sci. 2011; 139(1–2):44–57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.018spa
dc.relation.referencesKara K. The in vitro digestion of neutral detergent fibre and other ruminal fermentation parameters of some fibrous feedstuffs in Damascus goat (Capra aegagrus hircus). J Anim Feed Sci. 2019; 28(2):159-168. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/108990/2019spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez RG, Quintanilla JB, Aranda J. White-tailed deer food habits in northeastern Mexico. Small Rumin Res. 1997; 25(2):141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00960-1spa
dc.relation.referencesNavarro-Cardona JA, Olmos-Oropeza G, Palacio-Núñez J, Clemente-Sánchez F, Vital-García C. Dieta, población y capacidad de carga del venado cola blanca (Odocoielus virginianus) en dos condiciones de hábitat en Tlachichila, Zacatecas, México. AP. 2018; 11(6):15-23. https://revista-agroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/421spa
dc.relation.referencesJose S, Dollinger J. Silvopasture: a sustainable livestock production system. Agroforest Syst. 2019; 93(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00366-8spa
dc.relation.referencesAsante BO, Villano RA, Battese GE. Integrated crop-livestock management practices, technical efficiency and technology ratios in extensive small-ruminant systems in Ghana. Livest Sci. 2017; 201:58–69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.03.010spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Mara FP. The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Anim Feed Sci Techn. 2011; 166–167:7–15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.074spa
dc.relation.referencesHristov AN. Historie, pre-European settlement, and present-day contribution of wild ruminants to enteric methane emissions in the United States. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90(4):1371–1375. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4539spa
dc.relation.referencesPiñeiro-Vázquez AT, Canul-Solís JR, Alayón-Gamboa JA, Chay-Canul AJ, Ayala-Burgos AJ, Aguilar-Pérez CF, et al. Potential of condensed tannins for the reduction of emissions of enteric methane and their effect on ruminant productivity. Arch Med Vet. 2015; 47(3):263–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2015000300002spa
dc.relation.referencesPatra AK. Trends and projected estimates of GHG emissions from indian livestock in comparisons with GHG emissions from world and developing countries. Anim Biosci 2014; 27(4):592-599. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13342spa
dc.rightsMiguel Chávez-Espinoza, Israel Cantú-Silva, Humberto González-Rodríguez, Oziel Dante Montañez-Valdez - 2022spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2246spa
dc.subjectExtensiveeng
dc.subjectintensiveeng
dc.subjectgoatseng
dc.subjectsemi-intensiveeng
dc.subjectsheepeng
dc.subjectsustainableeng
dc.subjectwhite-tailed deereng
dc.subjectCaprinosspa
dc.subjectextensivospa
dc.subjectintensivospa
dc.subjectovinosspa
dc.subjectsemi-intensivospa
dc.subjectsistemas de producciónspa
dc.subjectsustentabilidadspa
dc.subjectvenado cola blancaspa
dc.titleSistemas de producción de pequeños rumiantes en México y su efecto en la sostenibilidad productivaspa
dc.title.translatedSmall ruminant production systems in Mexico and their effect on productive sustainabilityeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Colecciones
HAJ. Revista MVZ