Publicación:
Diseño de un Marco para la Apropiación de Tecnologías de la Información en Docentes Universitarios: Un Enfoque en Cuatro Fases

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez Castillo, Julio Cesar
dc.contributor.authorMacea Anaya, Mario
dc.contributor.authorBaena Navarro, Rubén Enrique
dc.contributor.authorCARRIAZO-REGINO, YULIETH PAOLA
dc.contributor.authorContreras Florez, Johan Lorenzo
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad de Córdoba
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T20:19:28Z
dc.date.available2023-10-24T20:19:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-04
dc.description.abstractLa implementación de Tecnologías de la Información (TI) en la educación universitaria abarca múltiples aspectos, desde la incorporación de tecnologías accesibles hasta la transformación disruptiva del aprendizaje mediante tecnologías emergentes. Este artículo propone un marco conceptual que describe cuatro fases de adopción de TI por parte de docentes universitarios: Adopción Tecnológica, Colaboración y Retroalimentación en línea, Exploración y Experimentación Tecnológica, y Adopción de Tecnologías Emergentes. Se detalla cada fase, partiendo desde la integración de herramientas tecnológicas accesibles hasta la incorporación de tecnologías emergentes como la inteligencia artificial, realidad virtual y aumentada, para crear experiencias de aprendizaje innovadoras y transformadoras. Este artículo se fundamenta en referencias bibliográficas que respaldan cada fase y que subrayan la importancia de personalizar el aprendizaje, promover la interacción entre estudiantes y docentes, y aplicar enfoques basados en proyectos para enriquecer el proceso educativo.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.eissn2953-4917
dc.identifier.issn2953-4917
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/7845
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.placeCiudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
dc.relation.citationeditionhttps://dm.saludcyt.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/53
dc.relation.citationendpage9
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationvolume2
dc.relation.ispartofjournalData & Metadata
dc.relation.referencesMalik S, Rohendi D, Widiaty I. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) with Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Integration: A Literature Review, Atlantis Press; 2019, p. 498–503. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114.
dc.relation.referencesChen M, Zhou C, Wang Y, Li Y. The role of school ICT construction and teacher information literacy in reducing teacher burnout: Based on SEM and fsQCA. Educ Inf Technol 2022;27:8751–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10989-7.
dc.relation.referencesApoki UC, Al-Chalabi HKM, Crisan GC. From Digital Learning Resources to Adaptive Learning Objects: An Overview. In: Simian D, Stoica LF, editors. Modelling and Development of Intelligent Systems, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020, p. 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39237-6_2.
dc.relation.referencesKazoun N, Kokkinaki A, Chedrawi C. Factors that Affects the Use of AI Agents in Adaptive Learning: A Sociomaterial and Mcdonaldization Approach in the Higher Education Sector. In: Themistocleous M, Papadaki M, editors. Information Systems, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022, p. 414–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_29.
dc.relation.referencesMirata V, Hirt F, Bergamin P, van der Westhuizen C. Challenges and contexts in establishing adaptive learning in higher education: findings from a Delphi study. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2020;17:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00209-y.
dc.relation.referencesUppal MA, Ali S, Gulliver SR. Factors determining e-learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology 2018;49:412–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552.
dc.relation.referencesCarriazo-Regino Y, Baena-Navarro R, Torres-Hoyos F, Vergara-Villadiego J, Roa-Prada S. IoT-based drinking water quality measurement: systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 2022;28:405–18. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v28.i1.pp405-418.
dc.relation.referencesRethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews 2021;10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
dc.relation.referencesPage MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine 2021;18:e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583.
dc.relation.referencesTonacci A, Sansone F, Conte R, Domenici C. Use of Electronic Noses in Seawater Quality Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Biosensors 2018;8:115. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8040115.
dc.relation.referencesErtmer PA. Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? ETR&D 2005;53:25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683.
dc.relation.referencesErtmer PA. Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. ETR&D 1999;47:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597.
dc.relation.referencesHew KF, Brush T. Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Tech Research Dev 2007;55:223–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
dc.relation.referencesErtmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT, Sadik O, Sendurur E, Sendurur P. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education 2012;59:423–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.
dc.relation.referencesPelgrum WJ. Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education 2001;37:163–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8.
dc.relation.referencesBingimlas KA. Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed 2009;5:235–45. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275.
dc.relation.referencesLawless KA, Pellegrino JW. Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research 2007;77:575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921.
dc.relation.referencesJones A. A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. 2004.
dc.relation.referencesKopcha TJ. Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education 2012;59:1109–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014.
dc.relation.referencesGroff J, Mouza C. A Framework for Addressing Challenges to Classroom Technology Use. AACE Review (Formerly AACE Journal) 2008;16:21–46.
dc.relation.referencesIfinedo E, Rikala J, Hämäläinen T. Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: Considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs. Computers & Education 2020;146:103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103760.
dc.relation.referencesKopcha TJ, Neumann KL, Ottenbreit-Leftwich A, Pitman E. Process over product: the next evolution of our quest for technology integration. Education Tech Research Dev 2020;68:729–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09735-y.
dc.relation.referencesWilliams-Buffonge N-AG. Covid 19 and Education: The Untold Story of the Barriers to Technology Adoption From A Tertiary Viewpoint. Journal of Education and Practice 2021;12:8.
dc.relation.referencesLiu C, Bangou F. The influence of a group of Chinese EFL teachers’ beliefs on lesson planning with video-based synchronous computer-mediated communication: A qualitative multiple case study - Castledown. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning 2022;4:41–61. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v4n2.780.
dc.relation.referencesAtabek O. Experienced educators’ suggestions for solutions to the challenges to technology integration. Educ Inf Technol 2020;25:5669–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10243-y.
dc.relation.referencesSoalablai S, Wilson A, Baltes B. Elementary Teachers’ Use of 1:1 Tablets in Lesson Planning and Presentation on a Western Pacific Island. Journal of Educational Research and Practice 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2022.12.1.08.
dc.relation.referencesWijaya KF. Investigating Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on the Integration of ICT in English Language Learning. ELTR Journal 2022;6:72–85. https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v6i2.123.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez EN. Exploration of K-5 Teacher Decision-Making Related to Student Use of Technology. PhD Thesis. Walden University, 2019.
dc.relation.referencesSteele DE. Factors Influencing Degree of Implementation of Technology in a Georgia High School. PhD Thesis. Walden University, 2017.
dc.relation.referencesJin H, Pagram J, Cooper M. Pre-service teachers’ preparedness to use ICT: A Western Australian perspective. TENZ-ICTE 2017 2017:90–102.
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista D, Guerrero CD, Collazos CA, Maestre-Góngora G, Hurtado-Alegría JA, Medina-Cárdenas Y, et al. Smart University: a vision of technology adoption. Revista Colombiana de Computación 2021;22:44–55. https://doi.org/10.29375/25392115.4153.
dc.relation.referencesSeufert S, Guggemos J, Sailer M. Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre- and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior 2021;115:106552.
dc.relation.referencesBernacki ML, Greene MJ, Lobczowski NG. A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)? Educ Psychol Rev 2021;33:1675–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8.
dc.relation.referencesBishop PA, Downes JM, Netcoh S, Farber K, DeMink-Carthew J, Brown T, et al. Teacher Roles in Personalized Learning Environments. The Elementary School Journal 2020;121:311–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/711079.
dc.relation.referencesBrown A, Green T. Issues and Trends in Instructional Technology: Consistent Growth in Online Learning, Digital Content, and the Use of Mobile Technologies. In: Branch RM, editor. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook: Volume 41, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018, p. 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67301-1_5.
dc.relation.referencesSchlosser L, Hood CE, Hogan E, Baca B, Gentile-Mathew A. Choosing the Right Educational Technology Tool for Your Teaching: A Data-Privacy Review and Pedagogical Perspective into Teaching with Technology. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 2022;51:236–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221137298.
dc.relation.referencesHarrison M, Quisias J, Frew EJ, Albon SP. A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Teaching and Learning Technology in a Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences. AJPE 2019;83. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6834.
dc.relation.referencesNegrín-Medina MÁ, Bernárdez-Gómez A, Portela-Pruaño A, Marrero-Galván JJ. Teachers’ Perceptions of Changes in Their Professional Development as a Result of ICT. Journal of Intelligence 2022;10:90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040090.
dc.relation.referencesFrancom GM. Barriers to technology integration: A time-series survey study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2020;52:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1679055.
dc.relation.referencesOttenbreit-Leftwich A, Liao JY-C, Sadik O, Ertmer P. Evolution of Teachers’ Technology Integration Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices: How Can We Support Beginning Teachers Use of Technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2018;50:282–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1487350.
dc.relation.referencesSaavedra LEP, Cervera MG. Desafíos para las universidades colombianas frente a políticas nacionales e internacionales de integración de TIC en la educación. Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa 2020:51–65. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.73.1617.
dc.relation.referencesSoza MGM. TPACK para integrar efectivamente las TIC en educación: Un modelo teórico para la formación docente. Revista Electrónica de Conocimientos, Saberes y Prácticas 2020;3:133–48. https://doi.org/10.5377/recsp.v3i1.9796.
dc.relation.referencesScherer R, Tondeur J, Siddiq F, Baran E. The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior 2018;80:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://dm.saludcyt.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/53
dc.titleDiseño de un Marco para la Apropiación de Tecnologías de la Información en Docentes Universitarios: Un Enfoque en Cuatro Fasesspa
dc.titleDesigning a Framework for the Appropriation of Information Technologies in University Teachers: A Four-Phase Approacheng
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Articulo.pdf
Tamaño:
742.15 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
15.18 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Facultad de Ingenierías